Posts Tagged ‘Trump’

Obama Wiretapped Trump

Posted by Troy on 20th March 2017 in Current Events, Political

They continue to hammer Trump over his claim that Obama wiretapped him.

First, I believe Trump really does believe Obama wiretapped him.  I am guessing that he is basing this on all the leaks (etc).  The FBI and others have come out and said that there is no proof of this.

However, there are other options.

1 – Obama and his ilk could have gone outside of all government agencies.  Do you really think that the CIA (etc) are the only ones capable of hacking and stuff?  Just ask Hillary and the DNC!  Anyone can do it!  Yes, there are mercenaries that you can hire.  Private eyes, etc.  This is possible.

2 – Does one really think official orders need to be given to make things happen?  Could it be that Obama just said, “Wow…I really think someone should really look into Trump…” within earshot of certain people?  Like you haven’t done similar?

3 – Do you really trust the CIA not to defend itself?  Could it be that they do not like Trump’s positions?  Could it be that they are protecting themselves by sabotaging Trump?  When the CIA said “Yes…we can listen to you through your smart-TV…but we would never do it to American citizens!” did you think “Yeah, right…”?  If so… why do you have much trust in them at all as an organization?

Honestly…none of this really matters.  What matters is the economy.  If in four years we have 5% growth, Trump will be re-elected, and it wouldn’t matter if you caught him on camera with a transexual Russian hooker.  If the economy roars under Trump, he wins.  If it fizzles, he’s probably gone.  All this other stuff is irrelevant.

Long Live the Constitution!

Thank You, Putin

Posted by Troy on 3rd March 2017 in Current Events, Political

Before I begin, the idea that Trump is a pawn of Putin is ludicrous, and I will explain this below.  However, first let me mock you.

If Putin caused Hillary to lose, I want to thank Vladimir.  Thank you, Vlad, for saving our country.  Thank you.

Seriously.  I believe Hillary would have destroyed this country.  She would have sold us out to the globalists and taken our guns away.  Here’s the sad fact, Hillary supporters.  Even if you could prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Putin wanted Trump to be elected–even if you proved that he “handed the election to Trump,” I would still rather Trump had won.

Now, I will explain why it is ludicrous that Trump is some sort of Russian pawn:

1 – If Trump was in league with Russia, do you think he would have cracked jokes about Russia hacking and releasing Hillary’s e-mails?  Of course not.  In fact, he probably would have played up being anti-Russia.  It would have played well with the Conservative base, and there would be little danger involved because Russia was in on it.

2 – I know for a fact that there is nothing going on (at least to the greatest extent of anyone’s knowledge).  You know how I know?  Because it’s not plastered all over the front page.  You think that these leakers would say “Well, we have the thing that will sink Trump for sure… but let’s just leak that Flynn discussed sanctions on this phone call that we were tapping.”

3 – If Obama had any true concern that a Presidential candidate was being put forth by Russia, he would have had an obligation to bring that forward.  He didn’t.   If you believe that he was a good American President, he had to do this.  I don’t buy his, “I knew that Putin was trying to deliver the election to Trump, but I didn’t want to seem partisan.”  That is like saying, “I saw a black guy about to rape a woman, and I didn’t stop him because I didn’t want to seem racist.”  No.  You stop it.  You have a moral obligation to stop it.  If your vanity is that pathetic, then by God, he never should have been President.

4 – On to Sessions.  I am sorry, but meeting with a Russian Ambassador is not suspicious.  Let’s be honest, Ambassadors are heavily monitored and spied upon (just ask Flynn).  Putin is ex-KGB.  If he was running some kind of deal through, he would use an American that was converted.  It would be someone you had no idea was remotely related to Russia.   This is just silly.

5 – Sessions answered the question.  His comment about never meeting with Russians was clearly in the context of being a Trump surrogate.

6 – Finally… Sessions is a 70-year-old from the South.  He went through the 50′s.  He went through the missile crisis.  The nuclear hysteria of the 1980s.  The fall of the Berlin wall.  You honestly expect me to believe that Sessions cooperated with the Russians? Nope.  Not buying it.  Sorry.  Premise does not make sense.  You lose!  You get nothing!  Good-day, Sir!

Long Live the Constitution!

John McCain – Airing the Family’s Dirty Laundry

Posted by Troy on 20th February 2017 in Current Events, Political

I am all for freedom of speech.  Say whatever you want.  However, when you are overseas, SHUT YOUR MOUTH.  When you are talking to our allies and our enemies, you show a united front.  In a strong family, a husband and wife, a brother or sister, a parent and child may be fighting like rabid dogs, but publically, they show solidarity.  McCain should be saying things like “Divided?  Oh, don’t believe everything you hear on the news.  Our country is united and stronger than ever.”  Instead, he is trashing our President.  I also got onto the Dixie Chicks when they did this overseas regarding President George W. Bush.  Again, say anything you want at home.  When you’re out in the world, you do not trash your family.  You do not trash your country.  Doing so isn’t just in bad taste.  It emboldens our enemies and makes our allies frightful.  McCain, of all people, should know this.

Long Live the Constitution!

Riots, Martial Law, and other Lunacy

Posted by Troy on 2nd February 2017 in Current Events, Human Nature, Political

My dad always said, “If you start yelling, you’ve lost the argument.”  Yelling is the result of having run out of logical response and resorting to pure emotion.  I want to talk about Trump Derangement Syndrome.  Brett Hume coined the term after seeing people flipping out over Trump’s presidency.

Here’s some things that I’ve seen since that November day.  I’ve see Rosie O’Donnell recommending martial law.  I’ve been numerous faked hate crimes.  I’ve seen Sarah Silverman ask for a military coup.  I’ve seen California want to secede.  I’ve seen riots at Milo speaking events.  I’ve seen violence in the streets.  I’ve seen Madonna talk about burning down the White House.  I’ve seen Tim Kaine promote fighting in the streets.  All the while, people talking about fascism, white nationalism, how Trump’s view of America is dark, and all the while demanding that we come back together.

I don’t think people see the irony.  Martial law?  Military coup?  Beating the hell out of people?  These are the very essence of fascism.  Well…let’s be honest.  The Nazi party was a national socialist party.  Fascism is where the government sets prices.  What people confuse fascism with is authoritarianism.  The hallmark of an such regime is violence and force.  The Brown Shirts were the misinformed mob that went around an beat the shit out of anyone opposing their views.  Right now…gotta say that “the resistance” is looking a lot more like Brown Shirts.

As far as California wanting to secede…what arrogance!  You lost one bloody election.  If you had some wisdom about you, you might want to invoke the Tenth Amendment.  You might demand that the Federal government be responsible for less and individual states be responsible for me.  You might want to run your state how you want to run your state and let Georgia run their state.  But no…if you can’t inflict other’s with how you wish a state to be run, you will not be happy.  Why can’t you see the virtue that the Founding Fathers found in letting each state run their own affairs as long as it falls within the confines of the Constitution?

How can anyone take Democrats seriously when they talk about how dark Trump’s vision of America is when it’s the Democrats view that ONE ELECTION MEANS NAZISM?  How do you get darker than that?  How do I take you seriously on the grounds of “white nationalism” when you have preached black nationalism, Latino nationalism, gay nationalism, etc etc etc…when all a nation means is a group of people that identify as a group…something the left has enforced with militant vigor for my entire life?  How can you possibly promote any sort of unity when you say that a full 48% of the country are either white supremacists, misogynists, racists, or pathetic morons?  That is the general theory of the Trump election…is it not?  How can you “come together” with Nazis?  Did “Love Trumps Hate” end just because of one election?  It’s sad and it’s pathetic.

What makes more sense to you?  People you have known and loved your entire life that voted for Trump are closet Nazis OR that you are being mislead and riled up?  Which makes more sense?

You want to come together?  You want to change minds?  Try sitting down with one of these beloved friends and ask them “Why did you vote for Trump?”  Try to actually understand their point of view.  I don’t think I’ve ever thought, outright, that someone opposed my view due to them being stupid or hating America or any other stupid reason.  I have always assumed that their life journey has lead them to a viewpoint.  I generally understand their viewpoint.  I just disagree with their viewpoint, but in no case have I ever decided to hate someone for their viewpoint.  I have never yelled at someone for their viewpoint.  I have never insulted someone for their viewpoint.  I will say that in the vast majority of political discussions I have had with someone of an opposing viewpoint, those have been the end result  towards me.

Learn to listen.  You may learn something.  Maybe you will change your mind.  If not, at least you will learn that the other side is not full of monsters or full of hate.  You will learn that they have their reasons.  Communication and compassion, if anything, will bring us back together.  It’s like I always say…once you understand someone, it’s impossible to be mad at them.

Long Live the Constitution!

The Supreme Court Nominee and Hypocrites

Posted by Troy on 1st February 2017 in Current Events, Political

So I get to see Chuck Shumer talking about how the Supreme Court is too important not to have bipartisan support.  Gee…like the overhaul of our medical system (ie, 18% of our economy)?  I also remember how Democrats raged at Republicans being “obstructionists.”  I remember Obama constantly trashing Fox News and talk radio.  I see them foaming at the mouths because they can’t filibuster the cabinet seats (thank Harry Reid) and railing about using the nuclear option for the Supreme Court.  Hey…guys…MAD.  Mutually Assured Destruction.  That is the deterrent from using nukes.  Maybe you should have contemplated MAD when you invoked something EVEN YOU called “the nuclear option.”  Once someone pulls a nuke, the other is going to pull a nuke.  It’s WHY YOU DON’T PULL A NUKE!!!!!  Please write this down.  If you have trouble understanding it, I want you to read and re-read that over and over so that you might understand.

That being said, Republicans are being a little hypocritical at this juncture.  While the Democrats have taking “obstruction” to the point of absolute lunacy (and it’s backfiring as they look more and more foolish…learn to pick your battles, seriously), Republicans demanding a straight up and down vote on the Supreme Court nominee is laughable.  While they did follow prior tradition of not approving a nominee in an election year, it is very clear that they exercised their discretion and their power to do so.  If the Democrats were in charge of the Senate, they could have confirmed someone virtually overnight.  The reason for this is because the Democrats are unable to come up with a platform that the vast swath of States can get behind (otherwise, they would AMEND THE CONSTITUTION).  Instead, they rely on activist judges to do their bidding.  Why pass laws and take the heat?  Why go to all the trouble of actually AMENDING THE CONSTITUTION when you can have the Supreme Court just tell us that the Constitution suddenly changed!  The Senate never has to approve a new judge.  It’s part of the checks and balances system.  ”But that undermines the Supreme Court!  We need nine justices!”  No, we don’t.  We started out only having six (an even number).  Not having an odd number means nothing.  All it means is you might have a tie (which happens from time to time even with an odd number).  In this case, the lower court’s ruling stands.  If the people don’t like it, they will vote their Senator out and replace him.  Example: You have Democratic President and a Republican Senate.  The people believe that if a Democrat places a justice on the Supreme Court they will undo the 2nd Amendment.  As such, they continually put in Republican Senators that never appoint the Democratic appointee.  Is it distasteful?  Possibly, but you do see how this becomes a check and balance.  It is possible that a party may obtain an electoral majority while possibly having vast opposition from the majority of states.

So do I want the Republicans to enact the nuclear option?

No.  First, I’d like to go back to having NO CLOTURE.  As mentioned above, pulling nukes lead to more nukes.  This is super early in Trump’s Presidency.  There are 38 Democrats.  The longest filibuster was 24 hours and 18 minutes set by Strom Thurman.  Say what you will…he was old school.  I doubt any of these whimps could last more than 20 hours.  So that means that the absolute longest they could hold out would be 38 days.  So, let’s do this.  ”Okay, filibuster.  While you are talking, we will be reading the laws that the House has been passing while you blather on and on.”  Pay them no attention.  At the end of the day, take the CSPAN footage and just put together a compilation of every stupid thing they say.  Make it a YouTube sensation.  Mash it up with video clips (etc) a la Water’s World.  Just absolutely mock the shit out of them.  Meanwhile, they are making themselves look dumber and dumber with each passing day.  I doubt it lasts more then ten days.

That is what they should do go ahead and start the hearings, and let’s go.

Long Live the Constitution!

The Lie of Free Trade

Posted by Troy on 28th January 2017 in Current Events, Political

Trump talks about free trade and fair trade.

All the conservative pundits talk about free trade as some sort of holy attainment.

Now I’m about to bring the truth.

There is no such thing as fair trade.

What do I mean by that?  Well, first of all, each country has different resources and cultures.  Some are going to be better positioned than others.  For instance, when Adam Smith wrote the Wealth of Nations, he spoke about China and how poorly developed it was compared to European countries.  The main cause for this was the governmental, institutional, and cultural powers that existed at the time.  He remarked how China’s economy had remained virtually stagnant for centuries and would probably continue as such until such time as the features changed and allowed China to expand.  As such, one country will be more powerful and will have greater trading power than another.  America is this country.  As the most industrious and wealthy country on the planet, it controls much in regards to trade.

All that aside, what do these free-trade puritans mean?

Ahem.  Well, by free-trade, what we mean is that there should be no artificial barriers to trade between countries.  More or less, we are against boycotts, banned goods, and tariffs.

Oh.  Well, that’s good… but what about the minimum wage?

Pardon?

You know.  The minimum wage, OSHA, the EPA, regulations, standards, and so on and so on and so on.

I’m sorry…I really don’t follow.

Well, you want America to have free trade with China.  What do we have in America?  We have minimum wage laws.  China doesn’t [at least, not to the extent that we do].  China manipulates their currency.  China dumps coal pollution all over the place.  China doesn’t care about worker safety.  China doesn’t care if their products are made with toxic materials.  Given this, China is sure to make a product at less cost than an American product.  So how is this free-trade?  By declaring free-trade in an environment where two countries have vastly different economic environments, one will be the winner and the other will be the loser.  In this case, America will be the loser.  And even if the American product somehow survives, Congress will pass a law making the American product illegal, forcing people to buy the Chinese product, but forbid American companies from making the Chinese product because it is too toxic.  [Seriously, this is EXACTLY what happened when Congress made the freakin' incandescent bulb illegal].

Now, if you wanted to remove all the barriers in America and do away with the minimum wage and other such things and let the market decide how much a job pays; let the market decide how much pollution that a company can get away with before the citizens say “enough;” then I can go along with this; but you don’t want to do that.  Little known fact, Switzerland doesn’t have a minimum wage, but they have a very high standard of living.

Here’s an idea for free-trade/fair-trade that levels the playing field.  Why don’t we set tariffs based on the country?  For instance, Canada and the United States are very similar, so we will trade freely with them.  But why don’t we have standards that say “You have to have a reasonable minimum wage, or we will hit you with a 3% tariff.  If you produce more than x tons of carbon emissions per 100,000 citizens, we hit you with a 4% tariff.  This would actually make for fairer trade while also promoting our values.

Right now, the concept of free-trade is a globalist ideal.  The current set up favors a “spread the wealth” mentality as it outsources the production of more developed countries into less developed countries.  The side-effects of this is that it enforces the welfare state.  As these manufacturing jobs are lost, we will get cheaper goods.  Yey!  I can buy a pillow for $2 less.  Whoop dee doo.  The stockholders of the corporations get richer.  Of course, there are more unemployed and under-employed.  So you have to have a high tax on the corporate shareholders and redistribute the wealth so that pillow labor that you put out of work will have enough cash to buy that pillow for $2 less from China that will give him cancer because they used lead dust to clean the feathers.  Yey!

Long Live the Constitution!

Protesting Trump is LARPing for Liberals

Posted by Troy on 21st January 2017 in Current Events, Political

In LARPing, otherwise normal people (typically guys) dress up as warriors and wizards and fight a giant cardboard box box that’s a “dragon.”  This gives them the opportunity to pretend that they are powerful and brave without endangering themselves because the dragon isn’t a real dragon.  You can tell it’s not a real dragon by the fact that the dragon didn’t kill them.

I realize now that the same thing is going on with Trump.  Trump, according to Liberals, is if Hitler and Satan had a child.  So, Trump is a Nazi.  Trump is Hitler.  The so-brave liberals show up and protest Trump.  This leads them to feel powerful and brave without endangering themselves because Trump isn’t Hitler.  You can tell he’s not Hitler because Hitler would have killed them all.

Let’s be frank.  If Trump was Hitler, then liberals had best pray for rednecks.  It would be up to the rednecks to overthrow such a regime.  Just saying.  These protesters would be nowhere to be seen.

The Left and the Media is doing everything in their power to twist everything that Trump does and says–which is what they’ve been doing since the beginning.  Then you have protesters burning the American flag and smashing windows and beating people up.  You think this is going to win people over to your side?

Let’s examine the whole Hitler reference.

Hitler was a rebel-rouser.  Trump ran a billion-dollar company.  Obama was a community organizer.  Who sounds more like Hitler?

Hitler claimed pollution was the biggest threat.  Who does that sound more like?

Nazis burned down a bar and blamed the opposition.  Think of all the faked hate crimes.

Nazis had a gun ban (with a gun registry to start).

Nazis gave nationalized healthcare.

Nazis had guaranteed work.

Nazis had guaranteed, state-paid vacations.

Obama wanted a domestic security force as strong and as well-funded as the US Military.

Obama wanted compulsory volunteering (oxymoron).

The Left worried that Trump wouldn’t accept the election results.  After they lost, they refused to accept the election results.

They worried Trump supporters would riot and turn to violence.  The Left is the one that turned to rioting and violence.  My God!  Could you imagine if a bunch of Republicans showed up at the Obama inauguration and beat the hell out of his supporters?  What if a bunch of white kids kidnapped a special needs black child and beat the snot out of him?  The Left would have lost their minds.  Instead, what we here is “Well, we’re here to protest, and while I don’t approve of what they did, I can understand why they did beat the shit out of Trump supporters.”

The Left complains about fake news…but then actively creates fake news to smear Trump.

At some point… dawg, look in a friggin’ mirror.

Trump is not Hitler.

You are not a level 18 Red Wizard.  You’re just someone throwing a temper tantrum.

Long Live the Constitution!

YouTube would have stopped Hilter

Posted by Troy on 20th January 2017 in Current Events, Political

The Left better had hope that Trump turns into the monster the Left has painted him as.  If he doesn’t round up Muslims and try to re-educate LG-BLT peeps, then they’re just gonna look stupid.  but I’ve already decided that they are going to say, “Our resistance saved us!”  Yes…because all it would have taken to stop Hitler is a bunch of celebs on YouTube.

Eight years ago, the Media spoke of Obama as though the Messiah had returned.  This is because they had lost any true spirituality in them, and so they had turned to the false idols of the Earth, hoping for a Savior that will not come.  It is the once and future king syndrome.  This is why CNN mused about how if Trump and Pence both died today, the Kingdom of Obama would continue, a Kingdom without end.  They fail to comprehend that their own rejection of the religious had forced their spirit to convert their politics into a religion.

Contrast to today.  Trump is Hitler.  ”America first” is racial (somehow…despite us being the most racially diverse country on the planet).  Trump failed to acknowledge Hillary.  What the hell was he gonna say.  ”Ah…there she is!  If that bitch hadn’t lost, I wouldn’t be President!”  Bear in mind, if he acknowledged her, they would have asked why he didn’t acknowledge that she won the popular vote.  If he he acknowledged that, they would have demanded that he step-aside and let her rule.

The Left feared he wouldn’t accept the election results.  The Left didn’t accept the election results.

The Left feared Trump supporters would riot if he lost.  The Left has caused property damage and attacked Trump supporters.  But to the Left, such violence is warranted.  From a Trump supporter, it’s fascism.  From the Left, it’s a valiant resistance to a power that…well, shit…hasn’t done ANYTHING yet.

It’s just like the LG-BLT community.  Trump has probably always supported gay marriage and had come out during the REPUBLICAN primary saying he’d let Caitlin Jenner use whatever bathroom she wanted.  And yet, HE is the greatest threat the LG-BLT community has ever faced.  Bear in mind, Hillary once said that marriage being between a man and woman was a BEDROCK principle of the human race (in 2008).

Trump referred to himself 3 times in his speech, the American people 23 times, and “We” 48 times.

Compare THAT to ANY Obama speech.

‘Nuff Said.

Long Live the Constitution!

In defense and condemnation of Meryl Streep

Posted by Troy on 9th January 2017 in Current Events, Political

Trump called her overrated.  Alright…she is not overrated.  She is up there with Johnny Depp in the realm of good actors.  She becomes the part.

However, I condemn pretty much everything she said.  Hell, I handled my own father’s death with more reserve than her feigned performance.  That is to say, she is either acting, or she is horribly weak as a human being.  Unfortunately, she is such a good actress, I’m not sure which one it is.  Let’s take a look at her comments…

Basically, if your not a foreigner or an outsider, you’re not interesting.  In fact, without these things, people would be reduced to watching football or mixed martial arts.  So, of course, the condescension is ample.  Basically, you are either part of the hoity-toity, or your part of the knuckle dragging masses that watch football and drink Bud Light while kissing their own cousins.

Then she goes on and on about how the press and Hollywood has the obligation to protect against tyranny.

Hell, I wish they had had this point of view during the last 8 years while Democrats developed “anti-free speech” zones, pressed for censorship of the internet, did away with the filibuster (which royally bit them in the ass now that someone they actually disapprove of has come into power), and bypassed Congress by use of executive orders (this President has had more 9 to 0 opinions AGAINST him than anyone else in Supreme Court history).  Need I remind people of the celebrity video of celebrities pledging to be “a servant to Obama.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51kAw4OTlA0

This a bunch of morons pledging not to be a servant to the Constitution.  Not to the country.  Not to some value or ideal.  NOPE!  To a MAN!

And this is the same group of people that expects us to take them seriously when they talk about cult of personality, a “strong man,” or a dictatorship?

Based on the last eight years, it became apparent that the Left LOVES a dictator.  They just want a dictator that they approve of.  At every executive overreach, at every example of legislating from the bench, they cheered.  Now that someone is in power they don’t like…they worry about executive overreach.  They worry about a strong central government.  They worry about the Supreme Court.  They worry about every single thing which should show them why they should not want an all powerful central government with an all powerful executive at the head.  Maybe…just maybe…the Founders had a good idea about state sovereignty.  Maybe the Federal government shouldn’t be involved with everything and the states should be allowed to live how they wanna live.  That way, Georgia could be Georgia.  California could be California.  New York could be New York.  And we will all get along.

Long Live the Constitution!

Russia Interferring with Our Elections

Posted by Troy on 5th January 2017 in Current Events, Political

Trapper and Obama keep saying Russia has interfered with our elections.  I find it very telling that he doesn’t point out that Mexico and the UN also interfered with our elections.  Let’s examine their claim.

1 – Let’s assume that Russia did hack our election.  First of all, there is evidence that the Russians tried to hack both the Democrats and the Republicans.  The Republicans were smart and didn’t fall for it, and the Democrats were dumb as shit and did.  That’s pretty telling right there.

2 – All of the hacks were basically true statements of what Hillary and the DNC think of Americans.

3 – Nothing was said about Mexico, the UN, and other countries that wanted Hillary to win and Trump to lose.

4 – Nothing is said about us interfering with Russia’s election or Israel’s election.

5 – Nothing is mentioned of the news media and Hollywood interfering with our elections, and they did so with false statements regarding Trump and misconstruing what he said.

So… if you tell the truth about how a candidate really feels about you… that’s interfering.  If you lie… that’s okay.

Again, it all comes down to what side you are on.  No Liberal had any trouble with all the leaks, unfounded allegations, and leaks.  If someone had Trump’s tax return, they would have been heralded as heroes.

Lame.  Just sooooooo lame.  #sorelosers!

Long Live the Constitution!