Posts Tagged ‘terrorists’

Nice Terrorist Attack

Posted by Troy on 14th July 2016 in Current Events

That’s Nice, France (pronounced Niece – seriously, I’m not a bloody troll).

I just have to ask: How much more will Europe take?

The Washington Post recently reported the upward estimate of women molested during New Year’s Eve last year to over 2,000 German women.  Then there was the Paris attack.  In both cases, the ruling class has said that they will not allow these dastardly attacks to stop them from brining in Syrian refugees.

I have to ask, what would it take?  Clearly, the leadership in these countries must be fans of the European Union.  As such, they love the idea of different cultures running roughshod over all of Europe, erasing national identity.  This is the reason why Britain left.

Of course, if you were a complete cynic, you would say that the reason why European leaders (and ours) love the refugees is that it is an influx of dependent voters, which is a great base for Leftists (Globalists are always Leftists).  Also, it is an excuse to spy on their own people and confiscate their own people’s guns.  Isn’t that a wonderful system?  Inject a portion of society that your own people do not want and use that influx as an excuse to take way the people’s freedoms?  Isn’t it also great that these poor refugees are never going to live in the neighborhoods of the leaders?  And even if they do, the leaders will be protected by guns which are denied to their own citizens.

If you don’t think this is the case, remember San Bernardino.  Two Muslim extremists got guns and kill Americans.  The Left’s reply?  Well, let us not stop being humanitarian.  We have to keep brining in Syrian refugees.  What we really need to do is get rid of guns so that these newcomers can’t get guns.  And don’t worry…we’ll just spy on everyone using the NSA to make sure you’re safe.  But if the NSA uncovers any illegal immigrants, we won’t punish them in any way because that would be wrong.  Do you notice the pattern yet?  Are you paying attention at all?

Long Live the Constitution!

Obama Using Human Tragedy to Push Gun Control… AGAIN

Posted by Troy on 15th June 2016 in Current Events, Political

Never let a crisis go to waste, right?  With every mass shooting, they make a new push for gun control.  Here are the facts:

An assault weapon is an effective weapon, but other weapons are available that would have had similar results (such as a sawed off 12-gauge).  If they can’t get an assault weapon, they will buy other weapons or make a bomb or poison gas, etc.  As such, an assault weapons ban will not work.  That’s not even assuming that they won’t go to the black market and get one anyway.  If you can buy crack, what makes you think you can’t buy an AR-15 after they are made illegal?

The Terrorist/No-Fly list.  The issue with this is that you get on this list by them just putting you on there.  You have no right to see the “evidence” facing you.  It makes getting off the list impossible.  What’s to prevent them from saying that right-wing bloggers, tea partiers, etc, are all terrorists.  Boom.  You’re done.  The NRA has said they support this assuming that the FBI investigates you and settles the case.  So I will go one further.  If you are put on a no-fly/terrorist list, they have to take you to court and they have to settle the case one way or the other after showing you the evidence they have against you.  They have 30 days in order to do this.  After this, they pay you a $75,000 a day penalty like the EPA charged a Wyoming man that dug a home-made pond on his land.

I remind you, the Orlando terrorist bought his guns legally.  The San Bernardino terrorists had a friend buy theirs.  This is why gun laws are going to be largely ineffective.

I refuse to give up my rights.  Doing so will not make us any safer.  Let them live without armed protection for a while and see how they like it.

Long Live the Constitution!

People on the Terror Watch List Should Be Able to Buy Guns

Posted by Troy on 3rd December 2015 in Current Events, Political

The Democrats are talking about how they need to close the Terror Watch loophole.  This sounds like something that is so common sense on the surface.  Why would you want people that are on the Terror Watch List to be able to buy guns?  The reason is: because they can put ANYBODY on the list.  They just have to come up with a criteria.  Bear in mind, these are the same people that wanted to put veterans and people that demand adherence to the Constitution on the domestic terrorism list.  Based on that, I’d be rather heartbroken if I WASN’T on the list already.

I remember when Bush came up with the Terror Watch List.  The Liberals cried their eyes out about how people on this list have no way to see the evidence against them and no way to clear their name.  Now they want to take away a Constitutional right.

Hell, based on that logic, let’s take away other rights too if the government decides to put you on the list of people that do not deserve Constitutional rights.  Why let these supposed terrorists have freedom of speech?  Why let them vote?  Why allow them to be Muslim…since Islam does seem to be something to keep out of the hands of some people.  Ooo, let’s deny them the right to vote.  If your viewpoints are different than those in power, you could end up being a terrorist, after all.   We don’t want terrorist voting, do we?  Do they need a right to a trial?  What about slavery?  Ooooo, can we use political dissents as slaves?  Neat!  Hell, let’s just save the trouble and round them up for re-education/extermination camps.

Do you get it now?

Long Live the Constitution!

San Bernardino Shooting

Posted by Troy on 2nd December 2015 in Current Events

Well, it took the Democratic candidates about ten seconds to blame the San Bernardino shootings on the NRA and lax gun laws.  Of course…I mean, this was San Bernardino.  Not Georgia or Texas or Montana or something…but whatever, sure…it’s gun laws.

So we all had to sit there and watch for hours while the media and people tried not to say the obvious…that this is Islamic terrorism.  Of course it’s terrorism.  You have an attack very similar to what happened in Paris with no motivation other than the slaughter of defenseless people.  But we can’t say it’s Muslim Terrorists…that would be stereotyping.  Let’s be honest…in an act of terror against random, defenseless people…bet Muslim.  It’s a safe bet.

I am looking forward to Obama’s speech.  I think it will go something like this:

“Now, let’s not rush to judgement.  We should not demean an entire religion for the acts of a few people.  Islam is a religion of peace, and anyone that kills innocent people is not a true Muslim.  That being said, let’s demean all guns because they were the tool of choice for some false-Muslims to kill innocent people.  The only way for us to be safe is to ban all guns and get the Syrian refugees over IMMEDIATELY!”

Long Live the Constitution!

Can Someone Tell Me Why Accepting Syrian Refugees is So Important?!!!

Posted by Troy on 18th November 2015 in Current Events, Political

No, really.  Tell me.  Why is it so friggin’ important?  Is there a reason?  How will accepting refugees improve American in any way, shape, or form?

Of course, Obama ridiculed the GOP as being afraid of three-year-old orphans.  You can tell that even HE doesn’t believe this crap.  Yeah…we’re all afraid of the three-year-old orphans.  I’m sure that 100% of the refugees are widows and small children.  Wait…they’re not?  Wait…there are grown men?  Men from the ages of 13 to 64 that might be willing to die for their religion.

So, why is there a burning NEED to take these refugees?  Hell, at this point, the only thing that makes any logical sense is he wants there to be a terrorist attack so that he can declare martial law and stay in power.  Of course, that would be the last thing he did because either the military would dispose him or America (particularly the South) would rebel.  Someone would kill him at that point.  So I’m not overly concerned by this.

But seriously, someone explain the logic of taking 10,000 people into our population where as many as 25% confess at least being sympathetic to a known terrorist organization.  Of course, the dangerous ones are just going to lie.  And it’s not just the men.  Two women were suicide bombers in Paris.  At the very least, they could at least locate the refugees to only states and cities that explicitly agree to accept them.  But that’s not the Obama way.  His way is to force his will on others.  Why?  Because he is a Fascist.  Tell me how he isn’t…

Long Live the Constitution!

Crazy Jihadis are gonna get the Holy War they want

Posted by Troy on 13th November 2015 in Current Events

And it’s not gonna go well.

Wait wait…Sorry…no.  France doesn’t have a Muslim problem…they have a gun problem.

Wait, France has draconian gun laws?  How did this happen then?

Obviously, this is the work of the French Tea Party.  Domestic terrorism.  This is surely it.

At least, that’s what you might think to hear Obama talk.  Hey Europe, how’s those Syrian refugees working out for ya?!  Yo, Obama and Kerry, tell us again about our moral duty to take on Syrian refugees.  Can they stay in the White House with you?

Yo, France!  You let these gunmen kill 158 of you and wounded 200 (current count)?  Shit, are you kidding me?!  Charge!!!!  Of course, this isn’t in the French character, but there you go.  There is NO way that a handful of gunmen could have killed more than 20 if you had just charged.  That’s even if they had full automatics.  Just not going to happen.  I know some attacks were bombs, but still.

My cousin pointed out an odd fact.  Europe has no concealed carry laws.  You know, if I went through World War II, I think that I’d want all my countrymen to have arms.  Good point.  Why is that?  Dunno.  Would some armed people made a difference?  Maybe.  I would like the option of shooting back.

You know, Carson was ridiculed for saying that maybe things would have been different if the Jews had guns.  Ya know, if I know they were rounding up Southern men and putting them in camps, I might be willing to make my last stand.  He was also mocked for saying he wouldn’t advocate for a Mulsim President.  I bet agreement with that is increasing.  I also bet Trump’s numbers are climbing.

Well, this is what you get, Europe.  You have been increasing your Muslim immigration and birth rates while decreasing your own.  You have ridiculed Christianity and promoted secularism, thinking that people wouldn’t hunger for a higher truth and be swayed by other offers of faith.  You have made it illegal to speak ill of Islam as though that would sate the appetite of these killers.  This is what you get.

Hopefully, America will learn the lesson.

Long Live the Constitution!

Freedom of Speech and Drawing Mohammed

Posted by Troy on 6th May 2015 in Current Events

Baseline facts: A group held a drawing Mohammed contest to celebrate free speech.  This, not surprisingly, caused two Muslims to go unglued and attempt to shoot up the place.  They failed and were shot by an off duty cop.

In a rare instance, I was happy to agree with Obama who came out in defense of Free Speech.  It very much annoyed me when Bush did not do this in the similar Denmark bombing over Mohammed cartoons.

Since the group was drawing the Prophet Mohammed, it didn’t take long for many people to condemn the group for holding such a contest.  Others said that hate speech equates to “fighting words” and is not protected speech.  I should think that fighting words should be something particular to a specific person.  Otherwise, that law is so unworkable that it should be ignored.  In this day and age, flying off the handle is common place over ANYTHING.

I wonder where are these detractors regarding Ferguson and Baltimore and New York, where protestors are actively calling for dead cops.  Should they be arrested?  Hell, that’s straight up inciting violence.  In fact, a fair number of protestors in these places are anarchists who WANT there to be violence and are trying to incite it as best they can.  Why?  Because they want to tear the system down.  Why?  Because they are f___ing idiots.

Freedom of Speech must be protected at all times.  If someone was throwing a pro-choice rally, and a guy busted in and shot up the place because the speech offended him, would you say that they shouldn’t have thrown a rally that was going to offend a pro-lifer?  What is the threshold of offense that you wish to lay?  Shall we merely regulate our freedom based upon whatever threshold of the most easily offended group?  I say, “Nay.”  To do so is to render the Freedom of Speech a relic of the past.  I have always advocated that people need to just grow up and ignore those who offend them or deal with them in a mature fashion.

Long Live the Constitution!

The Terrorist Killings in France

Posted by Troy on 7th January 2015 in Current Events

Bush warned them.  Obama warned them.  However, European cartoonists felt like they could exercise their Freedom of Speech and drew a cartoon of the Prophet.  Of course, this offended some Muslims.  To protest the portrayal, Muslims busted in and killed 12 people.  Sounds about right.

It sickens me that our own Presidents wallow on their bellies and question the judgement of releasing such a cartoon.  We will stand up for the right of pornography.  We will defend the rights of rap artists to say the most vile things about women.  We well glorify sex and violence in our movies, in our video games, and any call to tame such things will be demonized as being against the Freedom of Speech, oh…but we mustn’t offend the Muslims.  Oh, we mustn’t offend the Muslims.

You want to shove a crucifix in a jar of piss?  Go ahead.  But we mustn’t offend the Muslims.

You want to portray Southerners as inbred?  Go ahead.  But we mustn’t offend the Muslims.

You want to write a rap song about how all women are bitches?  Go ahead.  But we mustn’t offend the Muslims.

What if what they are saying is true?  What of the Freedom of Speech?

It matters not over this one Golden Rule.  ”Do onto others, but we mustn’t offend the Muslims.”

Long Live the Constitution!  Long live the Freedom of Speech and those who are willing to die for Freedom’s sake.

Long Live the Constitution!

National Defense Authorization Act

Posted by Troy on 18th January 2012 in Current Events, Political

Today they released a report saying that domestic terrorists tend to blame the government or speak out about the government and use the Internet to connect with like minded people.  Even though the NDAA allows people to be arrested by the military and stripped of their constitutional rights (Amendments 5 to 8), there’s no cause for concern.  Of course, this could be used to describe the Tea Party, Anonymous, and countless other groups as terrorists.  The politicians admit this, but say that they would never abuse this power.  My favorite part of the debate was Mitt Romney being booed when he said he would have signed the NDAA.  Here’s the thing, even if I trusted Obama with all my heart (sorry, I couldn’t stop laughing…I’m back now), there’s no way I would give FUTURE PRESIDENTS WHO I DO NOT KNOW this power.  Someone is going to abuse it.

Ron Paul has put a bill up to repeal the most egregious part of the NDAA.  And yet people call Ron Paul dangerous.  Which is more dangerous to you?  Iran with a nuclear weapon, or your government stripping your rights?  Which of these two is actually more likely?  Iran uses a nuclear weapon, or your government crushing all of our liberties?

Long Live the Constitution!