Posts Tagged ‘Muslim’

Nice Terrorist Attack

Posted by Troy on 14th July 2016 in Current Events

That’s Nice, France (pronounced Niece – seriously, I’m not a bloody troll).

I just have to ask: How much more will Europe take?

The Washington Post recently reported the upward estimate of women molested during New Year’s Eve last year to over 2,000 German women.  Then there was the Paris attack.  In both cases, the ruling class has said that they will not allow these dastardly attacks to stop them from brining in Syrian refugees.

I have to ask, what would it take?  Clearly, the leadership in these countries must be fans of the European Union.  As such, they love the idea of different cultures running roughshod over all of Europe, erasing national identity.  This is the reason why Britain left.

Of course, if you were a complete cynic, you would say that the reason why European leaders (and ours) love the refugees is that it is an influx of dependent voters, which is a great base for Leftists (Globalists are always Leftists).  Also, it is an excuse to spy on their own people and confiscate their own people’s guns.  Isn’t that a wonderful system?  Inject a portion of society that your own people do not want and use that influx as an excuse to take way the people’s freedoms?  Isn’t it also great that these poor refugees are never going to live in the neighborhoods of the leaders?  And even if they do, the leaders will be protected by guns which are denied to their own citizens.

If you don’t think this is the case, remember San Bernardino.  Two Muslim extremists got guns and kill Americans.  The Left’s reply?  Well, let us not stop being humanitarian.  We have to keep brining in Syrian refugees.  What we really need to do is get rid of guns so that these newcomers can’t get guns.  And don’t worry…we’ll just spy on everyone using the NSA to make sure you’re safe.  But if the NSA uncovers any illegal immigrants, we won’t punish them in any way because that would be wrong.  Do you notice the pattern yet?  Are you paying attention at all?

Long Live the Constitution!

Orlando Shooting Used to Push Gun Control

Posted by Troy on 12th June 2016 in Current Events, Human Nature, Political

I got to wake up to the news that 20 people were killed last night at a night club.  That turned into 50 killed and 53 wounded.  And of course, I instantly thought “Obviously a Southern white male demanding adherence to the Constitution,” much like any sane person would.  But it actually turned out to be a Muslim terrorist.  Ya know…starting to get annoyed by the word “extremist.”  Just throwing that out there.  Just smacks of PC-ness that is unwarranted at this point in the game.  And, of course, I made a prediction that Obama’s response would be “We have to get rid of guns, people.”  And that’s pretty much what he did.

So, of course, we have to put up with them importing more Muslims into our country (seriously look up the immigration rates since 9/11…illogically, we’ve increased the visas to these countries).  So after these shootings, instead of examining how we look at mosques that we know are espousing extreme view points, we are talking about banning guns.  Shall we forget that the mosques raided after the Paris attacks had a stash of AK-47s and ammo?  Or, as I like to say… “Guns should be illegal so criminals can’t get them…just like drugs.”  You don’t think these animals wouldn’t get guns or explosives or poisons or whatever they want to use to kill us?

Obama asks if we want to be this type of country.  So, that led me to ask…what would it take before I decided that I would be willing to give up my right to keep and bear arms?  I guess the first thing I would have to see is that all of our government officials and buildings give up their own guns and armed security guards and fancy alarm systems and live like the average American.  If they feel safe enough to live like that for ten years…we can talk, but really I wouldn’t go for it even then.

The right to keep and bear arms is the Second Amendment for a reason.  They said “Shall not be infringed” for a reason.  I’m not willing to give up my Constitutional rights just because of these terrorists.

Long Live the Constitution!

San Bernardino Shooting

Posted by Troy on 2nd December 2015 in Current Events

Well, it took the Democratic candidates about ten seconds to blame the San Bernardino shootings on the NRA and lax gun laws.  Of course…I mean, this was San Bernardino.  Not Georgia or Texas or Montana or something…but whatever, sure…it’s gun laws.

So we all had to sit there and watch for hours while the media and people tried not to say the obvious…that this is Islamic terrorism.  Of course it’s terrorism.  You have an attack very similar to what happened in Paris with no motivation other than the slaughter of defenseless people.  But we can’t say it’s Muslim Terrorists…that would be stereotyping.  Let’s be honest…in an act of terror against random, defenseless people…bet Muslim.  It’s a safe bet.

I am looking forward to Obama’s speech.  I think it will go something like this:

“Now, let’s not rush to judgement.  We should not demean an entire religion for the acts of a few people.  Islam is a religion of peace, and anyone that kills innocent people is not a true Muslim.  That being said, let’s demean all guns because they were the tool of choice for some false-Muslims to kill innocent people.  The only way for us to be safe is to ban all guns and get the Syrian refugees over IMMEDIATELY!”

Long Live the Constitution!

Crazy Jihadis are gonna get the Holy War they want

Posted by Troy on 13th November 2015 in Current Events

And it’s not gonna go well.

Wait wait…Sorry…no.  France doesn’t have a Muslim problem…they have a gun problem.

Wait, France has draconian gun laws?  How did this happen then?

Obviously, this is the work of the French Tea Party.  Domestic terrorism.  This is surely it.

At least, that’s what you might think to hear Obama talk.  Hey Europe, how’s those Syrian refugees working out for ya?!  Yo, Obama and Kerry, tell us again about our moral duty to take on Syrian refugees.  Can they stay in the White House with you?

Yo, France!  You let these gunmen kill 158 of you and wounded 200 (current count)?  Shit, are you kidding me?!  Charge!!!!  Of course, this isn’t in the French character, but there you go.  There is NO way that a handful of gunmen could have killed more than 20 if you had just charged.  That’s even if they had full automatics.  Just not going to happen.  I know some attacks were bombs, but still.

My cousin pointed out an odd fact.  Europe has no concealed carry laws.  You know, if I went through World War II, I think that I’d want all my countrymen to have arms.  Good point.  Why is that?  Dunno.  Would some armed people made a difference?  Maybe.  I would like the option of shooting back.

You know, Carson was ridiculed for saying that maybe things would have been different if the Jews had guns.  Ya know, if I know they were rounding up Southern men and putting them in camps, I might be willing to make my last stand.  He was also mocked for saying he wouldn’t advocate for a Mulsim President.  I bet agreement with that is increasing.  I also bet Trump’s numbers are climbing.

Well, this is what you get, Europe.  You have been increasing your Muslim immigration and birth rates while decreasing your own.  You have ridiculed Christianity and promoted secularism, thinking that people wouldn’t hunger for a higher truth and be swayed by other offers of faith.  You have made it illegal to speak ill of Islam as though that would sate the appetite of these killers.  This is what you get.

Hopefully, America will learn the lesson.

Long Live the Constitution!

Muslim Clock Maker – It’s a bomb!!!!!

Posted by Troy on 23rd September 2015 in Current Events

A 14 year old Muslim student brings a “homemade clock” to school.  To be funny, I suppose, he made the clock look like a bomb.  The police come in and arrest him and check out the clock…which was not a bomb.  And everyone went crazy.

If I tried to board a plane and cracked a joke about “Oh, must be my bomb,” no one would bat an eye if I got tackled, strip-searched, etc.  Why?  Because I kinda brought it on myself by being a dumbass.  Don’t tell me, “He’s just a kid.”  Fourteen is plenty old enough to know how to build a bomb (check out terrorist training camps).  It’s also old enough to know that you’re being an ass.

It’s also important to note that this kid’s parents are Islamic political activists.  Also, the kid had to try multiple times to get in trouble for the “bomb.”  As such, they WANTED him to get in trouble.  This was the equivalent of intentionally spilling coffee in your lap so you could sue.

To everyone that’s upset by the cops’ treatment of this boy or thinks that it was racist…here’s a question.  If a white kid came to school with something that looked like a bomb, would you want that looked at?  Here’s another question: if you were the principal, wouldn’t you want the cops to come verify that it’s not a bomb, etc?  Of course you would.  Why?  Because if it WERE a bomb, and hundreds of school kids died, how would you like to be the one out there saying:

“Well, I heard there was a student with something that looked like a bomb, but I figured he was just joking around because he’s just a kid.  Besides, he was a Muslim, and I didn’t want to look like a bigot.”

How well do you think that would play at the next PTA meeting?

Long Live the Constitution!

On Obama, Islam, Trump, and Carson

Posted by Troy on 22nd September 2015 in Current Events, Political

Trump and Carson have fallen off the cliff.  One dared not correct someone who called Obama a Muslim, and the other said he wouldn’t advocate for a Muslim for President.

I think Trump had an excellent retort:  Do you think Obama would defend me if someone said something bad about me?

Hell no.  Of course not.  But I have another issue…so…is being a Muslim a bad thing?  Sounds that way.  If being Muslim isn’t bad, then why would Trump be inclined to correct the man?  The only way this criticism holds any water is if being Muslim is a bad thing.  If the man had said, “Obama is a child molester,” then maybe Trump should say something to correct a maliciously false critique.  Otherwise, why should Trump involve himself?  By now, one believes that Obama is or is not a Muslim.  Nothing will convince that man otherwise.

Then there’s Carson.  He said he wouldn’t advocate a Muslim for President because Islam is inconsistent with American values.  Everyone went nuts.  So…what is consistent with American values?  A woman having to provide 6 eye witnesses to prove rape?  Stoning for adultery?  Stoning for being gay?  Fill in the damn blank on anything related to women?  Their pretty narrow view on Freedom of Speech?  Shall we continue?  Not to mention the fact that we keep getting heavily involved in the Middle East.  Let’s just put that out there.  Their religion requires that they advance Shariah Law.  And their religion also allows them to lie in order to advance Shariah.  Honestly…based on these two facts, how could anyone in their right mind ever vote for a Muslim for President unless they, themselves, were Muslim?  You can’t even judge such an individual on their words or actions because their religion gives one over-riding rule: Advance Shariah by any means possible.  Could it not be that they acted and spoke of tolerance and of Americana just to gain such a position of power to fundamentally transform America?  Just saying.

Ya know what?  The Democrats should run a Muslim.  That’ll show us.  The first Muslim President.  But I guess they prefer words over actions.  Words are cheap and easy, aren’t they?

Carson said he would not advocate a Muslim President.  He didn’t even say that he would ask others NOT to support a Muslim President.  He never said anything regarding if a Muslim COULD run.  Of COURSE a Muslim is ELIGIBLE to run.  Carson just thinks that a Muslim for President would be a mistake.  Anyone being intellectually honest would agree.  Anyone that disagrees is either Muslim themselves or so wrapped up in their worship of tolerance they are not being logical or honest with themselves…or are ignorant on the Koran.  I guess that’s another possibility.  Pick it up and give it a read.  It’ll give you a new perspective on Islam other than what the media is advocating.

Long Live the Constitution!

Freedom of Speech and Drawing Mohammed

Posted by Troy on 6th May 2015 in Current Events

Baseline facts: A group held a drawing Mohammed contest to celebrate free speech.  This, not surprisingly, caused two Muslims to go unglued and attempt to shoot up the place.  They failed and were shot by an off duty cop.

In a rare instance, I was happy to agree with Obama who came out in defense of Free Speech.  It very much annoyed me when Bush did not do this in the similar Denmark bombing over Mohammed cartoons.

Since the group was drawing the Prophet Mohammed, it didn’t take long for many people to condemn the group for holding such a contest.  Others said that hate speech equates to “fighting words” and is not protected speech.  I should think that fighting words should be something particular to a specific person.  Otherwise, that law is so unworkable that it should be ignored.  In this day and age, flying off the handle is common place over ANYTHING.

I wonder where are these detractors regarding Ferguson and Baltimore and New York, where protestors are actively calling for dead cops.  Should they be arrested?  Hell, that’s straight up inciting violence.  In fact, a fair number of protestors in these places are anarchists who WANT there to be violence and are trying to incite it as best they can.  Why?  Because they want to tear the system down.  Why?  Because they are f___ing idiots.

Freedom of Speech must be protected at all times.  If someone was throwing a pro-choice rally, and a guy busted in and shot up the place because the speech offended him, would you say that they shouldn’t have thrown a rally that was going to offend a pro-lifer?  What is the threshold of offense that you wish to lay?  Shall we merely regulate our freedom based upon whatever threshold of the most easily offended group?  I say, “Nay.”  To do so is to render the Freedom of Speech a relic of the past.  I have always advocated that people need to just grow up and ignore those who offend them or deal with them in a mature fashion.

Long Live the Constitution!

The Terrorist Killings in France

Posted by Troy on 7th January 2015 in Current Events

Bush warned them.  Obama warned them.  However, European cartoonists felt like they could exercise their Freedom of Speech and drew a cartoon of the Prophet.  Of course, this offended some Muslims.  To protest the portrayal, Muslims busted in and killed 12 people.  Sounds about right.

It sickens me that our own Presidents wallow on their bellies and question the judgement of releasing such a cartoon.  We will stand up for the right of pornography.  We will defend the rights of rap artists to say the most vile things about women.  We well glorify sex and violence in our movies, in our video games, and any call to tame such things will be demonized as being against the Freedom of Speech, oh…but we mustn’t offend the Muslims.  Oh, we mustn’t offend the Muslims.

You want to shove a crucifix in a jar of piss?  Go ahead.  But we mustn’t offend the Muslims.

You want to portray Southerners as inbred?  Go ahead.  But we mustn’t offend the Muslims.

You want to write a rap song about how all women are bitches?  Go ahead.  But we mustn’t offend the Muslims.

What if what they are saying is true?  What of the Freedom of Speech?

It matters not over this one Golden Rule.  ”Do onto others, but we mustn’t offend the Muslims.”

Long Live the Constitution!  Long live the Freedom of Speech and those who are willing to die for Freedom’s sake.

Long Live the Constitution!

Bergdahl Blunder

Posted by Troy on 4th June 2014 in Current Events

Do these people think ANYTHING through?  As best I can tell, President Obama is inept at EVERYTHING.  Maybe this is because he is just a community organizer, at heart.  He has never had any sort of executive responsibilities or powers.  Maybe he doesn’t understand the position.  Maybe he is used to the sell.  Rally the people.  Call them forth.  Get the photo op, and let the unwashed masses conquer.

Did they not ask anything about Bergdahl when they arranged this?  Did they just think, ‘We’ll say ‘we saved an American hero!’ and people will cheer for us.  They won’t care how we got him home as long as we got them home, and our voter base will love it as it gets more people out of Gitmo.”

What really happened is that they are getting killed by the move because:

1 – We negotiated with terrorists for Bergdahl’s release.  Just on principal, that’s bad.  However, it also gives terrorists even more incentive to kidnap Americans.  Good going, dipstick.

2 – We gave up 5 men for this guy.  I don’t buy the “Anything to get our man home,” sacred duty, bullshit.  If we had Osama bin Laden in jail right now, and the only way to save Bergdahl’s life is to release bin Laden, do you think we would?  We’d let him die, and we should.  It is a soldier’s duty to die for his country to protect our country.  Releasing one soldier at the risk of killing many other Americans defeats the whole purpose we are over there.  So we gave up 5 men (of the enemy’s choosing) for this guy.  That’s a BAD deal.  You suck at negotiations.  If you are going to negotiate with terrorists, at LEAST make a good deal!

3 – All of Bergdahl’s brothers-in-arms say he was a deserter at best and a flat traitor at worst.  If you have ever met people in the military, they are very loyal to their brothers-in-arms (even the assholes).  They would not say such things unless they believed it completely.  Sooooo yeah…

4 – Add into this that Bergdahl’s father shows up, speaking Arabic, quoting the Koran, and sporting a Muslim beard…  I’m sure plenty of Muslims are serving and have served our military faithfully.  This is a special case where one of our troops may have gone traitor on us.  Him being Muslim does make that more likely, doesn’t it?

5 – President Obama broke the law in how this deal went down.  That is straight up true.  It cannot be denied.

6 – There are some real Constitutional questions given number 5 and the particulars of this case…

7 – We did all of this to get back someone that renounced his US citizenship?

So, seriously…do they ever ask any follow-up questions?  Was this all a ploy to get us to stop talking about the VA scandal/show that he does care about “the troops?”  Is he just inept?  What is it?  I never can tell if he’s Machiavellian or just plain dumb…

Long Live the Constitution!

We mustn’t offend the Muslims

Posted by Troy on 11th September 2012 in Current Events

Oh, Heaven forbid!  We mustn’t offend the Muslims.  Egyptians stormed the US embassy and tore up our flag.  Why?  Because someone has decided to make an anti-Mohammed movie.  How did we respond?  We issued the following statement:

“The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims — as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions. Today, the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve our nation as the fitting response to the enemies of democracy. Respect for religious beliefs is a cornerstone of American democracy. We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others.”

Wow!  That’s really standing our ground isn’t it?  This reminds me so much of when the political cartoon of Mohammed walking around with a bomb in his turban made Muslims so mad they started suicide bombing places–obviously not understanding the concept of irony.  When they did that, Bush issued a statement saying that it was irresponsible of the cartoonist to draw that cartoon.  My God!  We are the United States of America.  We are supposed to stand up for the Freedom of Speech, but I guess it’s only the Freedom of Speech as long as it doesn’t offend a Muslim.  We mustn’t offend a Muslim!  Oh, Heavens no!  I wonder if the US government will demand The Book of Mormon return their awards.  They made fun of Mormons, but I guess Romney is a Mormon, and Mormons aren’t Muslims, so I guess it’s cool.  Right?

Here’s how we should have handled the storming of the embassy.  ”Praise A-” BLAM!  ”Great Sa-” BLAM!

Storming a US Embassy is an act of war.  That is US soil.  We should immediately cut all aid to Egypt and let them deal with the consequences for their actions.  If we are concerned about the well-being of our diplomats, we should bring them all home so we don’t have another Iran hostage crisis.

So much for the Arab Spring, huh?

Long Live the Constitution!