Posts Tagged ‘lawyer’

The Trump Investigation vs the Clinton Investigation

Posted by Troy on 10th April 2018 in Current Events, Political

The Hillary Investigation:

1 – Hillary Sets up a server.

2 – Possible motive?  Possibly to engage in pay for play without being caught.  At best, so that what she does and says won’t be in the public record.

3 – Possible negative outcome?  Bribery or injuring national security.

4 – FBI politely asks Hillary for documents.

5 – She turns over the documents and deletes all those other documents she deems as not relevant.  She then wipes the server and smashes all her devices with hammers ensuring that no one will ever see those documents she deleted.

6 – Her exoneration letter is written before she is even interviewed.

7 – Her highest level associates are granted attorney-client privilege (really crazy since they were not lawyers and were totally unqualified to act as attorneys…) and interviewed at the same time.  Which is kinda a “no-no” since you wanna interview people separately to see if their stories match up…generally speaking.

8 – Hillary herself is interviewed.  She is NOT put under oath.  She is NOT put on the record.  The interview is not record.  No notes are taken.

9 – The FBI holds a press conference basically saying that she is guilty of lying and gross negligence…but she didn’t intend to break the law and well…the lies are kinda unimportant and stuff… so she’s not going to be charged.  It probably has NOTHING to do with Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton meeting on the tarmac for half an hour…but hey, weird shit happens, right?

The Trump Investigation:

First of all, it starts off with Russian Collusion and then goes into Obstruction of Justice for… for… um… for obstructing an investigation into a collusion that didn’t happen?  But um, okay, so yeah, okay, so we just keep going… to STORMY DANIELS!  Yes, an alleged, consensual affair from 12 years ago from a KNOWN philanderer.

Okay… possible crime?  Maybe campaign finance issues… which would be more on the lawyer than on Trump… but okay…

Possible motivation?  To avoid embarrassment?

Possible negative outcome?  … … … Trump won the election?…?

Doors are being busted in left and right.

Millions of documents are turned over.

People are dragged in and put under oath.

Any faulty recollection, any variance, anything at all is being called lying to the FBI and people are being charged.

People’s families are being threatened with destruction, lives are being destroyed.  Doors are being kicked in.  Attorney-client privileged is being ignored.

And you want to know why we don’t believe the FBI?  You want to know why we doubt their objectivity?  Why we use terms like “The Deep State?”  This is what the FBI was under Hubert Hoover… and if this is how they are going to operate, THEY NEED TO BE DISSOLVED AND REPLACED.  These are SS tactics.  Ask yourself, with the NSA watching all your communications and the FBI  busting in the doors to the friggin’ President… what chance do YOU have!

Long Live the Constitution!

The New Gestapo

Posted by Troy on 10th April 2018 in Current Events, Political

Hmmmm, isn’t it interesting how the very people who were calling Trump Hitler are the ones cheering the police busting into a lawyer’s office and taking papers?  This is some serious SS shit.  We are in a police state.  Think of an America where a judge will issue a warrant to go in and seize your lawyer’s notes?!  Holy shit!  Now, you can say, “But they can’t use them against you.”  Oh yah, sure.  I’m sure that they will get a disinterested third party to read through them all, sort through, and completely forget all that he read and not let people who what he read.  I’m sure that the knowledge gleaned from those notes won’t be used to hunt for additional crimes and misdemeanors.  Wink wink, nod nod, say no more.  No reason to be alarmed now.

Long Live the Constitution?

Donald Trump Jr’s Collusion

Posted by Troy on 12th July 2017 in Current Events, Political

Let’s dissect what happened:

Last June (before the entire Russian explosion thing), an acquaintance contacts Donald Jr and tells him that he has a contact with information from the Kremlin which will incriminate Hillary Clinton.  Donald Jr. meets with her, attempting to get this information.

I wonder… If Hillary could have gotten pictures of Trump having sex with children from Putin, would she?  You bet she would.  Oh, she might give some “I hated getting the information this way… but I had to do it… I had to protect my country from this monster.”  And you can bet the media and the rest would have herald her for her courage.

These are the same people who praise Snowden for turning over intelligence to the community at large.  This is the same party that pardoned Manning for at best espionage, at worst treason.  Speaking of, what is treason?  Giving comfort and aid to our enemies.  What could that mean?  Could it mean doing an apology tour?  Obama.  Could it be giving Russia access to 25% of North America’s uranium after getting $500,000 from Russian entities from a speech and getting millions of donations  afterwards to their private foundation? Clinton.  How about structuring a nuclear arms deal that lets Russia expand their arsenal while we have to shrink ours?  Obama/Clinton.  What about paying a ransom and lifting sanctions to Iran when we know that they will use the money to fund terrorism and attack our interest?  Obama.  What about giving arms to known terrorists so that they can fight other people in the region?  Obama.  What about going to Cuba and legitimatizing a tyrannical government?  Obama.  What about releasing terrorist after terrorist from Gitmo?  Obama.  What about setting up an arms running deal to incriminate our own people so that you can push an anti-gun agenda on the premise that we are supplying arms that are killing Mexicans?  Obama.  What about demanding pro-Western rulers step down to be replaced by anti-American extremists?  Obama.  What about going to the Ukraine and using the Ukrainian government to do opposition research on Trump?  Clinton.  We could go on an on about this.

My point is this: either apply the standards uniformly, or not at all.

Specifically, until such time that it is show that there is a quid pro quo, I am most unconcerned.  I think the Left’s argument goes something like this: If Russia prefers that candidate, that candidate should step down–which is bizarre.  Frankly, I do not see that Russia truly preferred Trump.  If anything, I think Trump has been way stronger against Russia than Obama was in the last 8 years.  Have we forgotten that Obama gave Russia everything they wanted with the START treaty?  Did we forget that Russia took the Crimea under Obama?  That they did that laughable reset?  Do you remember when Obama drew a red line and then broke out in a cold sweat when Assad used chemical weapons anyway?  How Obama praised Russia and Russia’s fine work in promoting peace by brokering a solution to the chemical weapons…which rather conveniently let Obama backtrack on this red line that he had no intent in enforcing.

Don’t make me laugh.

If Hillary would have won, she would would stocked the Supreme Court with a 5-4 Liberal bias.  The Second Amendment would have died.  There is no limit to the evil that would have been plagued upon us.  You are going to be hard pressed to show me any amount of evil that Trump may do that will match this.

Long Live the Constitution.