Posts Tagged ‘Hillary’

Donald Trump Jr’s Collusion

Posted by Troy on 12th July 2017 in Current Events, Political

Let’s dissect what happened:

Last June (before the entire Russian explosion thing), an acquaintance contacts Donald Jr and tells him that he has a contact with information from the Kremlin which will incriminate Hillary Clinton.  Donald Jr. meets with her, attempting to get this information.

I wonder… If Hillary could have gotten pictures of Trump having sex with children from Putin, would she?  You bet she would.  Oh, she might give some “I hated getting the information this way… but I had to do it… I had to protect my country from this monster.”  And you can bet the media and the rest would have herald her for her courage.

These are the same people who praise Snowden for turning over intelligence to the community at large.  This is the same party that pardoned Manning for at best espionage, at worst treason.  Speaking of, what is treason?  Giving comfort and aid to our enemies.  What could that mean?  Could it mean doing an apology tour?  Obama.  Could it be giving Russia access to 25% of North America’s uranium after getting $500,000 from Russian entities from a speech and getting millions of donations  afterwards to their private foundation? Clinton.  How about structuring a nuclear arms deal that lets Russia expand their arsenal while we have to shrink ours?  Obama/Clinton.  What about paying a ransom and lifting sanctions to Iran when we know that they will use the money to fund terrorism and attack our interest?  Obama.  What about giving arms to known terrorists so that they can fight other people in the region?  Obama.  What about going to Cuba and legitimatizing a tyrannical government?  Obama.  What about releasing terrorist after terrorist from Gitmo?  Obama.  What about setting up an arms running deal to incriminate our own people so that you can push an anti-gun agenda on the premise that we are supplying arms that are killing Mexicans?  Obama.  What about demanding pro-Western rulers step down to be replaced by anti-American extremists?  Obama.  What about going to the Ukraine and using the Ukrainian government to do opposition research on Trump?  Clinton.  We could go on an on about this.

My point is this: either apply the standards uniformly, or not at all.

Specifically, until such time that it is show that there is a quid pro quo, I am most unconcerned.  I think the Left’s argument goes something like this: If Russia prefers that candidate, that candidate should step down–which is bizarre.  Frankly, I do not see that Russia truly preferred Trump.  If anything, I think Trump has been way stronger against Russia than Obama was in the last 8 years.  Have we forgotten that Obama gave Russia everything they wanted with the START treaty?  Did we forget that Russia took the Crimea under Obama?  That they did that laughable reset?  Do you remember when Obama drew a red line and then broke out in a cold sweat when Assad used chemical weapons anyway?  How Obama praised Russia and Russia’s fine work in promoting peace by brokering a solution to the chemical weapons…which rather conveniently let Obama backtrack on this red line that he had no intent in enforcing.

Don’t make me laugh.

If Hillary would have won, she would would stocked the Supreme Court with a 5-4 Liberal bias.  The Second Amendment would have died.  There is no limit to the evil that would have been plagued upon us.  You are going to be hard pressed to show me any amount of evil that Trump may do that will match this.

Long Live the Constitution.

YouTube would have stopped Hilter

Posted by Troy on 20th January 2017 in Current Events, Political

The Left better had hope that Trump turns into the monster the Left has painted him as.  If he doesn’t round up Muslims and try to re-educate LG-BLT peeps, then they’re just gonna look stupid.  but I’ve already decided that they are going to say, “Our resistance saved us!”  Yes…because all it would have taken to stop Hitler is a bunch of celebs on YouTube.

Eight years ago, the Media spoke of Obama as though the Messiah had returned.  This is because they had lost any true spirituality in them, and so they had turned to the false idols of the Earth, hoping for a Savior that will not come.  It is the once and future king syndrome.  This is why CNN mused about how if Trump and Pence both died today, the Kingdom of Obama would continue, a Kingdom without end.  They fail to comprehend that their own rejection of the religious had forced their spirit to convert their politics into a religion.

Contrast to today.  Trump is Hitler.  ”America first” is racial (somehow…despite us being the most racially diverse country on the planet).  Trump failed to acknowledge Hillary.  What the hell was he gonna say.  ”Ah…there she is!  If that bitch hadn’t lost, I wouldn’t be President!”  Bear in mind, if he acknowledged her, they would have asked why he didn’t acknowledge that she won the popular vote.  If he he acknowledged that, they would have demanded that he step-aside and let her rule.

The Left feared he wouldn’t accept the election results.  The Left didn’t accept the election results.

The Left feared Trump supporters would riot if he lost.  The Left has caused property damage and attacked Trump supporters.  But to the Left, such violence is warranted.  From a Trump supporter, it’s fascism.  From the Left, it’s a valiant resistance to a power that…well, shit…hasn’t done ANYTHING yet.

It’s just like the LG-BLT community.  Trump has probably always supported gay marriage and had come out during the REPUBLICAN primary saying he’d let Caitlin Jenner use whatever bathroom she wanted.  And yet, HE is the greatest threat the LG-BLT community has ever faced.  Bear in mind, Hillary once said that marriage being between a man and woman was a BEDROCK principle of the human race (in 2008).

Trump referred to himself 3 times in his speech, the American people 23 times, and “We” 48 times.

Compare THAT to ANY Obama speech.

‘Nuff Said.

Long Live the Constitution!

Russia Interferring with Our Elections

Posted by Troy on 5th January 2017 in Current Events, Political

Trapper and Obama keep saying Russia has interfered with our elections.  I find it very telling that he doesn’t point out that Mexico and the UN also interfered with our elections.  Let’s examine their claim.

1 – Let’s assume that Russia did hack our election.  First of all, there is evidence that the Russians tried to hack both the Democrats and the Republicans.  The Republicans were smart and didn’t fall for it, and the Democrats were dumb as shit and did.  That’s pretty telling right there.

2 – All of the hacks were basically true statements of what Hillary and the DNC think of Americans.

3 – Nothing was said about Mexico, the UN, and other countries that wanted Hillary to win and Trump to lose.

4 – Nothing is said about us interfering with Russia’s election or Israel’s election.

5 – Nothing is mentioned of the news media and Hollywood interfering with our elections, and they did so with false statements regarding Trump and misconstruing what he said.

So… if you tell the truth about how a candidate really feels about you… that’s interfering.  If you lie… that’s okay.

Again, it all comes down to what side you are on.  No Liberal had any trouble with all the leaks, unfounded allegations, and leaks.  If someone had Trump’s tax return, they would have been heralded as heroes.

Lame.  Just sooooooo lame.  #sorelosers!

Long Live the Constitution!

A Comprehensive Analysis of the Electoral College Overturning the Election

Posted by Troy on 15th December 2016 in Current Events, Political

It is amazing how so many Democrats have started espousing the wisdom of the Constitution after spending my entire life explaining to me what an outdated document it is!  So the basic premise is that the Republican electors should choose someone other than Donald Trump due to Hamilton’s writings in Federalist Paper #68 in which he said that the Electoral College is meant to safeguard against a demagogue taking power.  Naturally, Democrats view Donald Trump as an unqualified demagogue while Barak Obama was the smartest man to ever take office.  But that’s neither here nor there.

First, let’s look at History.  When was the Constitution written?  It was after the Articles of Confederation failed.  What was a major issue of this failure?  All states got the same vote (one vote a piece).  As such, Virginia (the richest, most populous state) had the same say as Georgia (the smallest state, population-wise).  This really annoyed the Virginians.  Regardless, the Articles of Confederation failed, and the Electoral College (along with the bicameral nature of the legislature) was a way to strike a balance between state sovereignty and population.  Now, originally, any number of people could run for President (they still can, in theory, but not in reality).  The top two became President and Vice President, accordingly.  This was changed with the Twelfth Amendment after the President and Vice-President of different parties were chosen, causing much chaos.  But the original intent was this:  In a race between six candidates, it was possible a demagogue could troll the bottom 20% of the population and win, whereas the other, qualified candidates only got 16% each.

Now, with the two party system, this is no longer the case.  You would have to argue that 46% of the population is stupid and deserve to have their vote overturned.  Now, this truly is the Left’s belief.  They really do look down at those living in rural areas.  Ergo, the will of that huge red swath between New York and California mean little to them.  As Marx said, the city folk need to save the country folk from their own stupidity (look it up if you don’t believe me).  And this is what Hollywood believes.  Oh, those poor, backwards, red-neck, inbreeds.  They don’t know how stupid they are.  They need a benevolent dictator to do what’s in their best self-interest.  They’re too dumb to know what’s good for them.  [Google C.S. Lewis and Robber Barons for a GREAT quote of the tyranny that's for our own good...it never ends.]

So, what if the Left got its way?

Well, if the election was given to Hillary: Civil War.  No joke.  That’s what we’re talking about.  At least a couple of million dead.

If the Democrats all voted for a Establishment Republican and enough Republicans joined forces to elect a Jeb Bush (etc): The death of the Republican Party.  It should also kill the Democrat party, but it won’t.  They’ll forgive them because “They saved us from Trump.”

But even if Civil War was averted, it will be the end of American elections.  Why bother voting?  The Electoral College will choose who is president regardless of our wishes.  It is the appearance of a representative democracy, only.  It is a farce.  They will allow your vote as long as it pleases the powers that be.  Once that genie is released, it will never be put back in the bottle.

Even if you believe that Russia wanted Trump to win…seriously…do you think Putin didn’t want Barack to win?  The wide-eyed idealist with zero experience and the spine reminiscent of an earthworm over a war-hardened veteran like McCain or a savvy business tycoon that understood the threat Russia posed?  Ha!  Putin ran circles around Barak, and Putin loved that Barack won both times.  Hillary posed little problem for Putin, so I doubt he worried too much about her gaining power anyway.  But even if you think Russia views Trump as the better option…which is the best option for us: Four years of Trump as President or civil war?  Because that’s your choice, peeps.  Choose wisely.

Long Live the Constitution!

Trump Not Prosecuting Hillary

Posted by Troy on 22nd November 2016 in Current Events, Political

This is something that has been troubling me for about a week.

Hillary Clinton broke the law, and she should be punished for it.

That being said, Trump is coming into a country that has been deeply divided.  He has been painted as a fascist.  There are people rioting in the streets.  Intellectuals are offering the concept that the Electoral College should overturn the results of the election.

The most important thing to him and for the country is that we begin to heal and be reunited.  If he goes after Hillary, nothing will get done, and we will remain divided.  That being said, he is basically spitting in the face of all of those who supported him.

If it were me, I would prosecute her.  Never compromise, even in the face of Armageddon.  Right is right.  Wrong is wrong.  However, this is not Trump’s modus operandi.  He is a deal-maker.  As such, I can understand his point of view.  And I will admit that his way is the correct way to bring us back together.  In that regards, I will scowl and turn my back.  As I said of Osama bin Laden: I really don’t care if he is brought to justice.  I know that one day, he will die.  And he will face justice.  Hillary is a 70-year-old who had just had her soul utterly crushed by the election.  Her health is obviously a wreck.  Soon, she shall die, and she shall face the judgement of God for any and all of her offenses.

We MUST reunite as a country.  We MUST remember WHO WE ARE.  We must do these things quickly, or all will be lost.  To that end, I shall let this go.

But he better the hell not put someone on the Supreme Court that won’t uphold the Second Amendment.

Long Live the Constitution!

But but…Hillary Won the Popular Vote!!!!

Posted by Troy on 21st November 2016 in Current Events, Political

So what?  The contest was for the Electoral College, not the popular vote.  If a football team got 400 yards and scored once during a game and their opponent got 200 yards…but managed to score twice off those 200 yards… guess who won.

1 – The idea that Hillary won the popular vote is moronic.  If anything, it proves that she didn’t run a good campaign.  She liked fundraising and holding events in friendly places and all but ignored the sea of Red that is the heartland.  Obviously, she didn’t know how to allocate her time effectively.  Trump would have run a different campaign if he needed the popular vote, and he may have won the popular vote if that was the goal.

2 – Some states stop counting absentee ballots if there is no need, so her popular vote gulf is overstated.

3 – It doesn’t matter because the Constitution states that the Electoral College is how the President is chosen.  There is no way to undo this.  Even if you passed a Constitutional Amendment tomorrow, it would only be good going forward.  Of course, I suppose that you could get 30+ electors to switch their vote, but that would surely lead to civil war.

Everyone is upset about the Electoral College.  Let me explain the Electoral College so that it makes sense: The founders wanted THE STATES to choose the President.  So it is THE STATES that vote for the President, not the people.  Now, every state allows their people to choose who the state will vote for.  Whenever you want to understand the Constitution, remember this:  The Founders wanted to balance the three forces: The States, the People, and the Federal government.  The House of Representatives is for the People.  The Senate was to represent the States (and it should go back to being chosen by State Legislatures, but that will never happen because people are too ignorant to understand why the Founders did anything).  Inside the government, checks and balances are used to prevent any function of government from taking control.  But this is a story for a different time.

Long Live the Constitution!

The Last Chance for Justice for Hillary Clinton

Posted by Troy on 6th November 2016 in Current Events, Political

The FBI will not do it.  Obama will just pardon her if she were ever charged.  The only possible way for there to be any justice is to NOT ELECT this woman.  If we elect this woman to be the President, we will be electing a person that 83% of us believe is guilty of crimes or unethical behavior.  Please bear this in mind when you vote.  You will elect someone that doesn’t love this country (Go back and look, not once has she worn a flag pin or spoken with true love in her voice for this country).  You will elect a criminal (you have to be blind not to see that).  And you will elect someone that thinks she’s better than the rest of us and has a low opinion of Americans (I estimate that she holds 70% of us in total disdain).

Please…don’t let this happen.

Long Live the Constitution!

Is “Shrill” Sexist?

Posted by Troy on 1st November 2016 in Current Events, Political

Obama said that Hillary will face insurmountable sexism in the way of people describing her as shrill and tired.  Well, let’s be frank…she does look tired–like…all the time.  But let’s examine the term “shrill,” which Obama states is never used to describe a man.

I am inclined to quote Mark Twain.  No…not “The difference between the right word and the wrong word is the difference between lightning and a harmless lightning-bug.”  I mean: “If death did not exist, we would be forced to invent it.”  In this case, if the term “shrill” did not exist, we would be forced to invent the term after hearing Hillary speak.  Literally, my eardrums actually remove themselves, sprouted legs, and tried to run away from me when I hear her.  Literally.  No, seriously, I’ve had to have them reattached twice already.  Dude…she is shrill.  Her voice has the same pleasing qualities as nails on a chalk board, a straw being moved up and down in a plastic lid, or feedback when the drunk karaoke singer gets the mic too close to the speaker.

But is the term sexist?  Obama wants to think that no man has been called shrill.  Well, he’s wrong.  A few have.  Notably, James Madison was described by his peers as having a shrill, reedy voice.  He still became President and is highly respected by history.

I find it odd that no one cries “Sexism!” when Trump is described as bellicose, bullying, or jingoist.  These are all terms that I’ve never heard applied to a woman, but I guess selective outrage is all the rage in this day and age.

Shrill isn’t sexist.  It is just that women are more likely to sound “high-pitched and piercing” (dictionary.com) and men are more likely to sound bellicose.  This is the reason why one term is nearly exclusively applied to women and the other term is nearly exclusively applied to men.

#ownedbythedictionarybitches

Long Live the Constitution!

Return of the Jedi – Hillary’s E-mail Saga Continues

Posted by Troy on 31st October 2016 in Current Events, Political

Ya know… we have bad short-term memory.

When the FBI originally investigated Hillary’s server, they said there’s no evidence that foreign nations hacked our server.  Hillary touted that there was no proof that Russia hacked her server…as such, she hadn’t put our country at risk.  Once all the lies and double dealings started coming to light, all of a sudden its “Russia hacked my server!  Russia hacked my server!”  Well, okay…fine.  Does that mean that you put our nation at risk?

When Comey let her go, he was the greatest law enforcement officer of all time.  Now that he’s reopened the investigation, he’s a rat bastard that is playing politics.

Democrats are howling that the FBI would dare release such info right before an election.  Oddly, Bill and Hillary had no problem with the FBI releasing information on the Iran Contra scandal which arguably cost George H. Bush re-election.

I think they are scared.  650,000 e-mails in a folder called “Life Insurance.”  Yikes.  God knows what’s on those e-mails.

When they released the tape of Trump talking vulgarly, I didn’t get mad at inside edition.  Trump said those things.  I shook my head and hoped that it didn’t cost him the election, but I didn’t get mad at the people for releasing the tapes.  I rolled my eyes at people pretending that they’ve never heard men say disgusting things when women weren’t around.  It’s different for the Democrats.  There is only one person to blame:  Hillary Clinton.  She had the private server.  She also likely committed crimes involving the Clinton Foundation.  She is reaping what she sowed.  Getting mad at Comey is childish.

Long Live the Constitution!

Goodbye, Never Trumpers

Posted by Troy on 27th October 2016 in Current Events, Political

After watching all the mainstream media fawn over Megyn Kelly for her debate against Newt Gingrich, I feel the need to talk about her and Glenn Beck and their ilk.  These are the people who are supposed to appeal to “conservatives.”  Well, siding with Hillary Clinton does not appeal to conservatives.  Let’s presume that Trump is a roll of the dice.  Fine and dandy…but Hillary is loaded dice.  Every roll will come up with fascism and corruption.

Megyn Kelly is demanding twenty million a year for her ratings which are the worst in Fox News’ prime time lineup.  Everyone turns off Fox after O’Reilly and then tunes back in for Hannity at 10 PM.  Honestly, if I was Fox, I’d cut her loose and let her go be the “conservative” pundit of CNN.  Her brand is destroyed.  The same with Glenn Beck.  Go to his website, and there will be 3 negative stories for Trump to every 1 negative story for Hillary.

Do these people think people are going to return to watching them after this election?  Especially if Hillary wins?  No, their careers are shot.  They have made out that Trump supporters are knuckle-dragging, women-hating, racist Nazis.  Here’s a real good measure for you.  I guarantee you that you know one Trump supporter that you respect, that you think really highly of.  You have known this person for years.  Which is more likely: that you have completely misjudged this person and he’s some sort of horrible person or that the media is trying to bully and brainwash you into believing what they want you to believe?

Fire Megyn Kelly and replace her with Kimberly Guilfoyle.  I promise I will be glued to my TV Monday through Friday at 9 PM.  I promise!

Long Live the Constitution!