When the CIA becomes the KGB – The Michael Flynn Saga

Posted by Troy on 15th February 2017 in Entertainment, Political

I hate to break it to CNN and the Democrats, but I have a feeling that most people are not all that concerned about Michael Flynn’s phone call.  It seems common sense and natural that an in-coming administration would talk to diplomats to establish relationships and start forging ahead.  The people really upset about this are the same people that chose to look the other way at the Fast and Furious, IRS scandal, Benghazi, the Clinton Foundation, and countless other gross violations.

Release the transcript.

That’s how you know that whatever said was pretty tame.  In this “Anti-Trump” environment, if it was actually something noteworthy, it would have been plastered all over the front page.

In regards to Michael Flynn, I will wait to pass any judgement until I see the transcript.  I assume that this is politicians playing politics.  Until I see some sort of proof that he actually said anything of note, I will not get excited.

However, what makes me afraid is this:

People are claiming that un-elected government workers should thwart foes foreign and domestic. Well, I agree.  It’s every citizen’s duty to defend the Constitution, but Trump had done nothing of the sort.  To date, he has done more to recognize the Constitution than any President I have seen in my adult life.  I remember Obama constantly assaulting the Constitution.  Bear in mind, he had more 0 to 9 decisions (including two Justices that HE appointed!) than any other President in history.

Transference/Projection:

Trump and his supporters are fascists that will be rioting in the street if he loses!  Well, it would seem that Hillary supporters are the ones that cannot accept the results of the election.  They are the ones that are rioting in the streets and hitting people and burning things.  Nothing says you are anti-fascist like beating the shit outta people that don’t share your beliefs.

Michael Flynn gave speeches to the Russians!  Yeah…and Bill gave speeches to them for millions of dollars in advance of 25% of the North American supply of uranium being sold to Russia.

The Left praised Bush for not getting involved in criticizing the next President.  Meanwhile, Obama sets up an organization and affiliates himself with groups funding the professional rioters.

The Left likes to portray Trump supporters as belligerent morons.  Yet, if they ever bring themselves to actually have a political discussion with me or any other Trump supporter, it quickly turns into the leftist just screaming.

The Left claims that Trump is delivering us into the hands of the Russians, and the Russians are trying to make us lose faith in our institutions.  Yeah, like California succeeding wouldn’t work against us.  No people can be conquered if they are united.  I have never seen us so fractured.  Instead of trying to come together at all, the Left is driving their base into a frenzy and sowing seeds of hatred among them.  What has Trump done to divide us anywhere on the scale of what I just mentioned?  In fact, considering the vile and extreme sentiments aimed at him constantly, his responses have been very mute and restrained.  To the regular people who spew bile at him, he has been completely silent.

Meanwhile, while all of this is going on, Trump’s administration is cracking down on Russia at the UN.  Mattis is getting NATO to actually fund more for their own defense.  Japan and Israel seem thrilled at our new President.  You can tell by their body language that when Trump says America stands behind their allies, they believe him–whereas Obama’s promises of support were mere bluff.  Just ask the Syrians what red-lines drawn by Obama meant.

What I fear is that the CIA really is the shadow-government that conspiracy theorists claim.  Do as they say, or they will destroy you.  This is dangerous.  If this is true, this means that no one is safe.  Also, there are protections in place to protect American citizens even if the CIA is tapping Russian diplomats (which they always are–just as we are always interfering in the elections of Russia, Israel, Canada, England…).  Given the time that these taps were happening, this means that Obama or one of his higher level minions spied on their political opponents.  You want to talk about Soviet Russia?

I don’t fear the Russians.  I have shot Russian ammunition.  After you do so, you will understand that Russia is no real threat.

If an operative shows up with plans for Trump to declare martial law, I will applaud them.  If someone assassinates a President that declares martial law, I will applaud them.  But what is happening here is that things are being leaked to undermine Trump’s Presidency.  They want him to look weak and stupid and hurt our international relations.  Why?  Because Trump is a danger to our country?  What seems to be a bigger danger to our country?  One man which is subject to the checks and balances that have kept us a free people for close to 250 years?  Or does it seem more likely that fomenting civil unrest, pitting countryman against countryman, undermining the trust of our allies, and emboldening our enemies?  Is having the world on fire worth making Trump look bad?  Bear in mind, you either want blood in the streets or Trump to lose in four years.  WOW!  Yey!  That’s all you will get if you are successful.  A weaker country.  That’s what you want.  Just for a better chance of beating one man at one election in four years.

To anyone that thinks I am being inconsistent, here is the difference between what is happening and Wiki-Leaks: Wiki-Leaks was a private group.  I also think they should be held accountable for their illegal acts.  That does not mean that I will not consider the information that is provided out of something that is obtained illegally.  Truth must be regarded, but those those broke the law must be held to account.  But this is a government agency working against its political opponents.  That is dangerous.  This is what makes totalitarian regimes.  If Flynn broke a law, he should face the punishment.  But I am MUCH more concerned about the government acting to suppress their political prisoners.

Long Live the Constitution!

Riots, Martial Law, and other Lunacy

Posted by Troy on 2nd February 2017 in Current Events, Human Nature, Political

My dad always said, “If you start yelling, you’ve lost the argument.”  Yelling is the result of having run out of logical response and resorting to pure emotion.  I want to talk about Trump Derangement Syndrome.  Brett Hume coined the term after seeing people flipping out over Trump’s presidency.

Here’s some things that I’ve seen since that November day.  I’ve see Rosie O’Donnell recommending martial law.  I’ve been numerous faked hate crimes.  I’ve seen Sarah Silverman ask for a military coup.  I’ve seen California want to secede.  I’ve seen riots at Milo speaking events.  I’ve seen violence in the streets.  I’ve seen Madonna talk about burning down the White House.  I’ve seen Tim Kaine promote fighting in the streets.  All the while, people talking about fascism, white nationalism, how Trump’s view of America is dark, and all the while demanding that we come back together.

I don’t think people see the irony.  Martial law?  Military coup?  Beating the hell out of people?  These are the very essence of fascism.  Well…let’s be honest.  The Nazi party was a national socialist party.  Fascism is where the government sets prices.  What people confuse fascism with is authoritarianism.  The hallmark of an such regime is violence and force.  The Brown Shirts were the misinformed mob that went around an beat the shit out of anyone opposing their views.  Right now…gotta say that “the resistance” is looking a lot more like Brown Shirts.

As far as California wanting to secede…what arrogance!  You lost one bloody election.  If you had some wisdom about you, you might want to invoke the Tenth Amendment.  You might demand that the Federal government be responsible for less and individual states be responsible for me.  You might want to run your state how you want to run your state and let Georgia run their state.  But no…if you can’t inflict other’s with how you wish a state to be run, you will not be happy.  Why can’t you see the virtue that the Founding Fathers found in letting each state run their own affairs as long as it falls within the confines of the Constitution?

How can anyone take Democrats seriously when they talk about how dark Trump’s vision of America is when it’s the Democrats view that ONE ELECTION MEANS NAZISM?  How do you get darker than that?  How do I take you seriously on the grounds of “white nationalism” when you have preached black nationalism, Latino nationalism, gay nationalism, etc etc etc…when all a nation means is a group of people that identify as a group…something the left has enforced with militant vigor for my entire life?  How can you possibly promote any sort of unity when you say that a full 48% of the country are either white supremacists, misogynists, racists, or pathetic morons?  That is the general theory of the Trump election…is it not?  How can you “come together” with Nazis?  Did “Love Trumps Hate” end just because of one election?  It’s sad and it’s pathetic.

What makes more sense to you?  People you have known and loved your entire life that voted for Trump are closet Nazis OR that you are being mislead and riled up?  Which makes more sense?

You want to come together?  You want to change minds?  Try sitting down with one of these beloved friends and ask them “Why did you vote for Trump?”  Try to actually understand their point of view.  I don’t think I’ve ever thought, outright, that someone opposed my view due to them being stupid or hating America or any other stupid reason.  I have always assumed that their life journey has lead them to a viewpoint.  I generally understand their viewpoint.  I just disagree with their viewpoint, but in no case have I ever decided to hate someone for their viewpoint.  I have never yelled at someone for their viewpoint.  I have never insulted someone for their viewpoint.  I will say that in the vast majority of political discussions I have had with someone of an opposing viewpoint, those have been the end result  towards me.

Learn to listen.  You may learn something.  Maybe you will change your mind.  If not, at least you will learn that the other side is not full of monsters or full of hate.  You will learn that they have their reasons.  Communication and compassion, if anything, will bring us back together.  It’s like I always say…once you understand someone, it’s impossible to be mad at them.

Long Live the Constitution!

The Supreme Court Nominee and Hypocrites

Posted by Troy on 1st February 2017 in Current Events, Political

So I get to see Chuck Shumer talking about how the Supreme Court is too important not to have bipartisan support.  Gee…like the overhaul of our medical system (ie, 18% of our economy)?  I also remember how Democrats raged at Republicans being “obstructionists.”  I remember Obama constantly trashing Fox News and talk radio.  I see them foaming at the mouths because they can’t filibuster the cabinet seats (thank Harry Reid) and railing about using the nuclear option for the Supreme Court.  Hey…guys…MAD.  Mutually Assured Destruction.  That is the deterrent from using nukes.  Maybe you should have contemplated MAD when you invoked something EVEN YOU called “the nuclear option.”  Once someone pulls a nuke, the other is going to pull a nuke.  It’s WHY YOU DON’T PULL A NUKE!!!!!  Please write this down.  If you have trouble understanding it, I want you to read and re-read that over and over so that you might understand.

That being said, Republicans are being a little hypocritical at this juncture.  While the Democrats have taking “obstruction” to the point of absolute lunacy (and it’s backfiring as they look more and more foolish…learn to pick your battles, seriously), Republicans demanding a straight up and down vote on the Supreme Court nominee is laughable.  While they did follow prior tradition of not approving a nominee in an election year, it is very clear that they exercised their discretion and their power to do so.  If the Democrats were in charge of the Senate, they could have confirmed someone virtually overnight.  The reason for this is because the Democrats are unable to come up with a platform that the vast swath of States can get behind (otherwise, they would AMEND THE CONSTITUTION).  Instead, they rely on activist judges to do their bidding.  Why pass laws and take the heat?  Why go to all the trouble of actually AMENDING THE CONSTITUTION when you can have the Supreme Court just tell us that the Constitution suddenly changed!  The Senate never has to approve a new judge.  It’s part of the checks and balances system.  ”But that undermines the Supreme Court!  We need nine justices!”  No, we don’t.  We started out only having six (an even number).  Not having an odd number means nothing.  All it means is you might have a tie (which happens from time to time even with an odd number).  In this case, the lower court’s ruling stands.  If the people don’t like it, they will vote their Senator out and replace him.  Example: You have Democratic President and a Republican Senate.  The people believe that if a Democrat places a justice on the Supreme Court they will undo the 2nd Amendment.  As such, they continually put in Republican Senators that never appoint the Democratic appointee.  Is it distasteful?  Possibly, but you do see how this becomes a check and balance.  It is possible that a party may obtain an electoral majority while possibly having vast opposition from the majority of states.

So do I want the Republicans to enact the nuclear option?

No.  First, I’d like to go back to having NO CLOTURE.  As mentioned above, pulling nukes lead to more nukes.  This is super early in Trump’s Presidency.  There are 38 Democrats.  The longest filibuster was 24 hours and 18 minutes set by Strom Thurman.  Say what you will…he was old school.  I doubt any of these whimps could last more than 20 hours.  So that means that the absolute longest they could hold out would be 38 days.  So, let’s do this.  ”Okay, filibuster.  While you are talking, we will be reading the laws that the House has been passing while you blather on and on.”  Pay them no attention.  At the end of the day, take the CSPAN footage and just put together a compilation of every stupid thing they say.  Make it a YouTube sensation.  Mash it up with video clips (etc) a la Water’s World.  Just absolutely mock the shit out of them.  Meanwhile, they are making themselves look dumber and dumber with each passing day.  I doubt it lasts more then ten days.

That is what they should do go ahead and start the hearings, and let’s go.

Long Live the Constitution!

Harry Reid Killed Bi-Partisanship

Posted by Troy on 30th January 2017 in Political

There, I said it.  At the alter of Obama, Harry Reid took the sacrificial pen and created the nuclear option whereby cloture required a mere 51 votes.  In other words, as long as you have enough votes to pass the law, you can pass the law.  This was not the purpose of cloture.  Cloture was to make sure that a law was amenable.  Let’s look at the original purpose of the Senate and of the filibuster.

The Senate was originally meant to represent the interest of the STATES.  The PEOPLE got the HOUSE.  The STATES got the SENATE.  Federal laws were meant to be limited in scope and states were allowed to more or less do their own thing within certain parameters.  Really, what is the purpose of the Senate?  Treaties and confirmations and a few other items…but past that, it’s just an additional hurdle and doesn’t really have any real difference over the House other than just having fewer people you have to talk to, I suppose.  This is a moot point.  I can only convince about 10% of the population that the Senate should be picked by the states.  It’s just never going to happen.

The filibuster was unlimited.  If one person wanted to filibuster, they could.  And they should.  Each Senator should have a right to speak until he is horse in defiance of a law that will hurt his state.  That’s his job.  To try to protect his state.  But people couldn’t take not having their way, so we went from no cloture, to 75 votes, to 66 votes, to 60 votes, and now to 51 votes.  The next is to just do away with it all together.

I had some vague hope that the Republicans would reinstall the filibuster.  However, now I see that it will never be reinstalled.  As soon as one party did away with it, it was gone.  What fool would say “Okay, you took away the filibuster when you were in charge, but we will put it back in place now that we are in charge?”  It just doesn’t make sense because that side would filibuster you non-stop, and once they got back into power, they would do away with the filibuster again and ramrod their agenda down the people’s throat, yet again.

What this means is that now neither side has to play nice.  Neither side has to find people that both sides find acceptable.  Barring a case where the President and Senate are opposing parties, there will never be any cooperation from hence forth.

It’s a shame.  I hope people start reading the Founding Fathers and understanding their wisdom.

Long Live the Constitution!

The Lie of Free Trade

Posted by Troy on 28th January 2017 in Current Events, Political

Trump talks about free trade and fair trade.

All the conservative pundits talk about free trade as some sort of holy attainment.

Now I’m about to bring the truth.

There is no such thing as fair trade.

What do I mean by that?  Well, first of all, each country has different resources and cultures.  Some are going to be better positioned than others.  For instance, when Adam Smith wrote the Wealth of Nations, he spoke about China and how poorly developed it was compared to European countries.  The main cause for this was the governmental, institutional, and cultural powers that existed at the time.  He remarked how China’s economy had remained virtually stagnant for centuries and would probably continue as such until such time as the features changed and allowed China to expand.  As such, one country will be more powerful and will have greater trading power than another.  America is this country.  As the most industrious and wealthy country on the planet, it controls much in regards to trade.

All that aside, what do these free-trade puritans mean?

Ahem.  Well, by free-trade, what we mean is that there should be no artificial barriers to trade between countries.  More or less, we are against boycotts, banned goods, and tariffs.

Oh.  Well, that’s good… but what about the minimum wage?

Pardon?

You know.  The minimum wage, OSHA, the EPA, regulations, standards, and so on and so on and so on.

I’m sorry…I really don’t follow.

Well, you want America to have free trade with China.  What do we have in America?  We have minimum wage laws.  China doesn’t [at least, not to the extent that we do].  China manipulates their currency.  China dumps coal pollution all over the place.  China doesn’t care about worker safety.  China doesn’t care if their products are made with toxic materials.  Given this, China is sure to make a product at less cost than an American product.  So how is this free-trade?  By declaring free-trade in an environment where two countries have vastly different economic environments, one will be the winner and the other will be the loser.  In this case, America will be the loser.  And even if the American product somehow survives, Congress will pass a law making the American product illegal, forcing people to buy the Chinese product, but forbid American companies from making the Chinese product because it is too toxic.  [Seriously, this is EXACTLY what happened when Congress made the freakin' incandescent bulb illegal].

Now, if you wanted to remove all the barriers in America and do away with the minimum wage and other such things and let the market decide how much a job pays; let the market decide how much pollution that a company can get away with before the citizens say “enough;” then I can go along with this; but you don’t want to do that.  Little known fact, Switzerland doesn’t have a minimum wage, but they have a very high standard of living.

Here’s an idea for free-trade/fair-trade that levels the playing field.  Why don’t we set tariffs based on the country?  For instance, Canada and the United States are very similar, so we will trade freely with them.  But why don’t we have standards that say “You have to have a reasonable minimum wage, or we will hit you with a 3% tariff.  If you produce more than x tons of carbon emissions per 100,000 citizens, we hit you with a 4% tariff.  This would actually make for fairer trade while also promoting our values.

Right now, the concept of free-trade is a globalist ideal.  The current set up favors a “spread the wealth” mentality as it outsources the production of more developed countries into less developed countries.  The side-effects of this is that it enforces the welfare state.  As these manufacturing jobs are lost, we will get cheaper goods.  Yey!  I can buy a pillow for $2 less.  Whoop dee doo.  The stockholders of the corporations get richer.  Of course, there are more unemployed and under-employed.  So you have to have a high tax on the corporate shareholders and redistribute the wealth so that pillow labor that you put out of work will have enough cash to buy that pillow for $2 less from China that will give him cancer because they used lead dust to clean the feathers.  Yey!

Long Live the Constitution!

What I hope Trump teaches liberals

Posted by Troy on 26th January 2017 in Uncategorized

Harry Reid got rid of the filibuster because the Republicans got in the way of Obama’s dream.  Now that Trump is President, they decry the lack of the filibuster and want to bring it back.

When President Obama signed executive order after executive order, liberals cheered and defended it because Republicans were getting in the way of Obama’s dream.  Now that Trump is in charge and signing executive order after executive over, they are going nuts with worry and scorn.

Finally, liberals talk about how Trump is Hitler.  Trump will NEVER be Hitler.  Know why?  because Hitler got rid of the guns first.  As long as the Second Amendment stands, there can never be a Hitler in America.

In short, I hope that Trump’s Presidency teaches liberals the wisdom of the Founding Fathers.  There was a reason why they made the system to prevent sweeping change.  There was a reason why the Constitution is concerned with what the government cannot do to you.  There’s a reason why the the Constitution is a document restraining governmental power and protecting the individual’s rights.  It does not empower government.  It restricts government.  It doesn’t tell you what the government will do FOR you, it tells you what the government CAN’T to do to you.

I doubt that they will learn these lessons, but I hope these are the lessons liberals take away from the Trump presidency.  It’s a vain hope, but it’s a hope.

Long Live the Constitution!

Protesting Trump is LARPing for Liberals

Posted by Troy on 21st January 2017 in Current Events, Political

In LARPing, otherwise normal people (typically guys) dress up as warriors and wizards and fight a giant cardboard box box that’s a “dragon.”  This gives them the opportunity to pretend that they are powerful and brave without endangering themselves because the dragon isn’t a real dragon.  You can tell it’s not a real dragon by the fact that the dragon didn’t kill them.

I realize now that the same thing is going on with Trump.  Trump, according to Liberals, is if Hitler and Satan had a child.  So, Trump is a Nazi.  Trump is Hitler.  The so-brave liberals show up and protest Trump.  This leads them to feel powerful and brave without endangering themselves because Trump isn’t Hitler.  You can tell he’s not Hitler because Hitler would have killed them all.

Let’s be frank.  If Trump was Hitler, then liberals had best pray for rednecks.  It would be up to the rednecks to overthrow such a regime.  Just saying.  These protesters would be nowhere to be seen.

The Left and the Media is doing everything in their power to twist everything that Trump does and says–which is what they’ve been doing since the beginning.  Then you have protesters burning the American flag and smashing windows and beating people up.  You think this is going to win people over to your side?

Let’s examine the whole Hitler reference.

Hitler was a rebel-rouser.  Trump ran a billion-dollar company.  Obama was a community organizer.  Who sounds more like Hitler?

Hitler claimed pollution was the biggest threat.  Who does that sound more like?

Nazis burned down a bar and blamed the opposition.  Think of all the faked hate crimes.

Nazis had a gun ban (with a gun registry to start).

Nazis gave nationalized healthcare.

Nazis had guaranteed work.

Nazis had guaranteed, state-paid vacations.

Obama wanted a domestic security force as strong and as well-funded as the US Military.

Obama wanted compulsory volunteering (oxymoron).

The Left worried that Trump wouldn’t accept the election results.  After they lost, they refused to accept the election results.

They worried Trump supporters would riot and turn to violence.  The Left is the one that turned to rioting and violence.  My God!  Could you imagine if a bunch of Republicans showed up at the Obama inauguration and beat the hell out of his supporters?  What if a bunch of white kids kidnapped a special needs black child and beat the snot out of him?  The Left would have lost their minds.  Instead, what we here is “Well, we’re here to protest, and while I don’t approve of what they did, I can understand why they did beat the shit out of Trump supporters.”

The Left complains about fake news…but then actively creates fake news to smear Trump.

At some point… dawg, look in a friggin’ mirror.

Trump is not Hitler.

You are not a level 18 Red Wizard.  You’re just someone throwing a temper tantrum.

Long Live the Constitution!

YouTube would have stopped Hilter

Posted by Troy on 20th January 2017 in Current Events, Political

The Left better had hope that Trump turns into the monster the Left has painted him as.  If he doesn’t round up Muslims and try to re-educate LG-BLT peeps, then they’re just gonna look stupid.  but I’ve already decided that they are going to say, “Our resistance saved us!”  Yes…because all it would have taken to stop Hitler is a bunch of celebs on YouTube.

Eight years ago, the Media spoke of Obama as though the Messiah had returned.  This is because they had lost any true spirituality in them, and so they had turned to the false idols of the Earth, hoping for a Savior that will not come.  It is the once and future king syndrome.  This is why CNN mused about how if Trump and Pence both died today, the Kingdom of Obama would continue, a Kingdom without end.  They fail to comprehend that their own rejection of the religious had forced their spirit to convert their politics into a religion.

Contrast to today.  Trump is Hitler.  ”America first” is racial (somehow…despite us being the most racially diverse country on the planet).  Trump failed to acknowledge Hillary.  What the hell was he gonna say.  ”Ah…there she is!  If that bitch hadn’t lost, I wouldn’t be President!”  Bear in mind, if he acknowledged her, they would have asked why he didn’t acknowledge that she won the popular vote.  If he he acknowledged that, they would have demanded that he step-aside and let her rule.

The Left feared he wouldn’t accept the election results.  The Left didn’t accept the election results.

The Left feared Trump supporters would riot if he lost.  The Left has caused property damage and attacked Trump supporters.  But to the Left, such violence is warranted.  From a Trump supporter, it’s fascism.  From the Left, it’s a valiant resistance to a power that…well, shit…hasn’t done ANYTHING yet.

It’s just like the LG-BLT community.  Trump has probably always supported gay marriage and had come out during the REPUBLICAN primary saying he’d let Caitlin Jenner use whatever bathroom she wanted.  And yet, HE is the greatest threat the LG-BLT community has ever faced.  Bear in mind, Hillary once said that marriage being between a man and woman was a BEDROCK principle of the human race (in 2008).

Trump referred to himself 3 times in his speech, the American people 23 times, and “We” 48 times.

Compare THAT to ANY Obama speech.

‘Nuff Said.

Long Live the Constitution!

Obama, Manning, and Wiki-Leaks

Posted by Troy on 17th January 2017 in Current Events, Political

And now the Left has no room to talk about Russia hacking the election.

Since November, all I’ve heard is Russia hacking the election.  Russia hacking the election and giving it to Wiki-leaks.

Now, today, Obama commutes the sentence for Manning from 35 years down to 7.  What did Manning do?  Well, the most favorable position you could take is that he was guilty of espionage.  At worst, he was guilty of treason.

So, back in the day, there was a sizable portion of the Left that called for leniency for Manning.  After Bradley decided to become Chelsea, that increased.

But…then the hacking of 2016 happened!  Hillary lost!!!!!  Wiki-leaks baaaaaad.

Let’s compare the two:

Bradley Manning stole military documents and gave it to a foreign entity to be distributed to anyone with an internet connection–including our enemies.  Personally, I believe that he was a weak-willed person (as further proven by his sex-change operation) that was taken advantage of by Julian Assange, particular after Snowden’s fame as a whistle blower.  Even if the military did something wrong, Manning needed to take that to the press, not a foreign entity.  Of course, no one trusts the media anymore, but back then, that may have been acceptable.  These leaks gave away classified information and put agents at risk.  This, further, put American interests at risk.

Russia hacked the DNC.  What did they find out?  Hillary is out of touch.  Well…we knew that.  She disdains Joe Six-pack.  Well…we knew that.  She’s entitled.  Her team thinks low of Americans.  She sells influence.  At every turn, we knew or suspected everything that “was leaked.”  And they were all TRUE.  They could not deny it.

Manning’s betrayal revealed state secrets to our enemies.  The DNC hacks merely confirmed what many suspected.

So…what’s Obama’s logic?  Hacking personal emails is tantamount to undermining our very democracy, but giving away state secrets is no big deal?  He has lost any credibility on the leaks.

Long Live the Constitution!

Welcome back Bob Beckel!

Posted by Troy on 16th January 2017 in Current Events, Entertainment

I hate Juan Williams.  There.  I said it.  In fact, there have been times I’ve avoided “The Five” just because I didn’t want to listen to him–and that’s factoring in the fact that I am secretly in love with Kimberly Guilfoyle and could stare at her all night..  Juan always comes across as a condescending ass.  While Bob Beckel may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer, he comes across as likable, if sometimes a bit of a buffoon, but I’ll take a likable buffoon over a condescending ass any day of the week when it comes to a show that’s meant mostly for entertainment value.  While his welcome back episodes was a little rough (the chemistry has not quite returned), I am glad that they have finally replaced Juan Williams.

Long Live the Constitution!